Share

Another Major News Outlet Ditches ‘Climate Change’ for More Alarming Language

Share

Telemundo, the second-largest Spanish language U.S. television network, will now use “climate emergency” to describe global warming, citing the “scientific community and linguistics experts.”

This comes one month after The Guardian, a prominent U.K. newspaper, discarded climate change in favor of more alarming terms, like “climate emergency, crisis or breakdown.”

It might suit the political agenda of Democrats like former Vice President Joe Biden and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, but critics say hyping global warming coverage is sure to hurt the credibility of media outlets. (RELATED: Peak Coal? Not Anytime Soon, Says One Of The World’s Biggest Energy Companies)

“This can only backfire,” said Marc Morano, publisher of Climate Depot and author of “The Politically Incorrect Guide To Climate Change.”

“To further hype global warming to their new pet phrase ‘climate emergency’ will only serve to expose the media as having no objectivity on this issue,” Morano told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an email.

Trending:
Report: Family Outraged at Disney World - Realized the Evil Queen 'Actress' They Took Pics with Was a Man

A Telemundo executive, however, said terms like global warming and climate change — phrases routinely used by scientists — did not reflect the “reality” the world is facing.

“The use of clear and accurate language in covering critical subjects such as the climate emergency is not merely an option for journalists; it is their duty,” said Luis Fernández, Telemundo’s executive vice president of network news, Accuracy in Media reported Wednesday.

“The scientific community and linguistics experts agree that the world is facing a ‘climate emergency,’” Fernández said.

“Terms such as ‘global warming’ and ‘climate change’ do not fully reflect this reality, and at Noticias Telemundo we are true to our commitment to tell things as they are.”

Do you think using stronger language will help the "climate change" cause?

The Guardian editor-in-chief Katharine Viner made a similar argument when announcing her outlet’s move to more alarming rhetoric.

“The phrase ‘climate change,’ for example, sounds rather passive and gentle when what scientists are talking about is a catastrophe for humanity,” Viner said in May.

Critics, however, pointed out that while most climate scientists agree that human activities are warming the world, words like “crisis” or “emergency” are not widely used in serious scientific literature.

“We have reached a point, where it is almost irrelevant what the mainstream media does on this issue,” Morano said.

“Everyone knows their perspective and instinctively knows they are shilling for climate alarm and so-called solutions.”

Related:
Watch: AOC Sends Signal to College Protesters, Within Hours Mob Forces Columbia to Take Drastic Action

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

A version of this article appeared on The Daily Caller News Foundation website.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , ,
Share
Founded by Tucker Carlson, a 25-year veteran of print and broadcast media, and Neil Patel, former chief policy adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney, The Daily Caller News Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit providing original investigative reporting from a team of professional reporters that operates for the public benefit. Photo credit: @DailyCaller on Twitter




Conversation