Senate confirms abortion opponent as US judge in Louisiana
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate confirmed Louisiana lawyer Wendy Vitter as a federal judge Thursday, overcoming opposition from Democrats who criticized her anti-abortion stance and accused her of trying to hide her record on the issue.
Maine Sen. Susan Collins was the only Republican to oppose Vitter’s nomination, which was approved 52-45.
A former prosecutor, Vitter is general counsel for the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New Orleans and an outspoken abortion opponent.
Democrats said Vitter nonetheless failed to disclose hundreds of past statements opposing abortion, including a claim at a political rally that Planned Parenthood is responsible for killing 150,000 women a year. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., called the remark careless, reckless and wrong, and said it showed “incredibly poor judgment for somebody who is being considered for a lifetime judicial appointment.”
Vitter’s remarks, and other comments criticizing abortion, amounted to “the fearmongering of an activist who is entirely unfit for the federal bench,” Murray said.
She and other Democrats said the views of Vitter and other judicial nominees on abortion were increasingly important because of a strict abortion ban signed into law this week in Alabama.
“That legislation is nothing short of an attack on women, and it is part of a larger effort we are seeing today around the country to take away the constitutional right of women to safe, legal abortion and allowing politicians to make decisions for women about their bodies, their health and their lives,” Murray said.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell defended Vitter, saying her “impressive legal career includes experience in private practice and a decade in the Orleans Parish District Attorney’s office, where she handled more than 100 felony jury trials.”
Vitter, who is married to former Sen. David Vitter, R-La., drew widespread opposition from Democrats last year when she refused to say whether she believed the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark 1954 desegregation ruling in Brown v. Board of Education was correctly decided.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., who asked Vitter about the Brown case, said “the iconic ruling” by the Supreme Court “is special even among those well-established decisions. Anyone who fails to endorse such a sacrosanct decision is clearly out of the legal and societal mainstream and unworthy of confirmation.”
In a statement Thursday, Collins said Vitter’s remarks on the Brown case and comments “advancing discredited assertions about the impact of contraception and abortion on the incidence of cancer and domestic violence” led her to conclude that Vitter is “not well-suited to serve on the federal bench.”
Collins, who is up for reelection in 2020, said her decision was not based on Vitter’s personal views on abortion, but on whether she could put aside her personal views, especially since Vitter has encouraged doctors to circulate a pamphlet that linked contraception and abortion to cancer and an increased risk of domestic violence. The claims have been widely discredited.
Collins is viewed as a top target for Democrats next year and has drawn fierce criticism over her vote last year in favor of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Collins, who supports abortion rights, said Kavanaugh assured her during a private meeting that Roe v. Wade, the ruling that established abortion rights, is settled law.
Kavanaugh and Justice Neil Gorsuch, another President Donald Trump appointee, could make the court more willing to cut back on the right to abortion, if not take it away altogether.
Democratic Sens. Kamala Harris of California, Cory Booker of New Jersey and Kirsten Gillibrand skipped Thursday’s vote. All three are running for president.
The Western Journal has not reviewed this Associated Press story prior to publication. Therefore, it may contain editorial bias or may in some other way not meet our normal editorial standards. It is provided to our readers as a service from The Western Journal.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
