Share
Commentary

Biden Administration Accused of Intervening to Kill Bipartisan Bill Aimed at Holding White House Accountable

Share

It was supposed to be a win for ethical accountability in the executive branch — especially for Democrats who repeatedly accused presumptive GOP presidential nominee and former President Donald Trump of using his office to advance his family’s business interests, absent much evidence of that charge.

However, the bipartisan legislation might be killed in committee thanks to intervention from an unlikely source: President Joe Biden’s White House.

According to a Monday report in The Hill, the proposed ethics reform will potentially die on the vine because the folks at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. don’t want the House Oversight and Accountability Committee looking into the Biden family.

The bill was championed by committee chairman Rep. James Comer, a Kentucky Republican, and California Democratic Rep. Katie Porter.

Despite coming from different ideological corners of the political arena — Comer is a reliable conservative, Porter a noted progressive who lost a primary challenge to the relatively more moderate Rep. Adam Schiff for California’s open Senate seat — they pledged to line up an equal number of votes from both sides of their respective aisle for the bill after it was introduced last month.

Trending:
Condition of Trump's Injury Finally Revealed, Hole Is Absolutely Gigantic in Relative Terms

“That careful balance soon fell apart, however, after three Democrats backed out of their previous commitments to support the bill — vanishing, Porter said, after the White House reached out to her colleagues,” The Hill reported.

Three Democratic lawmakers — Reps. Ro Khanna of California, Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois and Kweisi Mfume of Maryland — withdrew their support on the night before the bill was to be introduced.

“It’s too partisan a tool to cudgel the president as opposed to a serious effort of bipartisan ethics reform,” Khanna said, adding he switched his vote after looking at “the content of it and then seeing some of the statements that I thought would be used.”

“I don’t think it was bipartisan enough,” the congressman said. However, he claimed the decision was reached “independently” and not by prodding from the White House.

Mfume, meanwhile, said he “wanted to see a larger bipartisan effort.”

“I was under the belief that there would be, and when there wasn’t, I just said, ‘Let me step off,’” he said.

Mfume also claimed there was no White House interference.

However, that seems unlikely when you realize what’s in the bill — which is a relatively mild piece of legislation — and what Democrats feared it would be used for.

The legislation centered around disclosure requirements for presidents and vice presidents regarding tax returns, conflicts of interests and any income earned from foreign sources by themselves or their relatives.

“Mr. Comer and I did extensive publicity about the bill. And [during] all of that publicity … both Mr. Comer and I took great pains to make clear that this is not about any future president, it is about having the right set of rules to restore trust in the executive,” Porter said.

Related:
Man Who Shot Reagan Speaks Out After Assassination Attempt Against Trump: 'Not the Way to Go'

“The truth is, it is about restoring trust in government. Full stop,” she said.

Apparently, “restoring trust” is all well and good unless it can cost you an election — and Comer, who has investigated the business affairs of both Hunter and James Biden, could have benefited from some of the disclosure requirements.

“For instance, it would require detailing any loans made to family members and documenting when immediate relatives join the president on Air Force One, including whether the travel was for business purposes,” The Hill noted.

Do you think the Biden administration is corrupt?

“Both situations were raised by Republicans after Biden, while serving as vice president, loaned money to his brother and had his son accompany him on trips.”

Now, Comer said, without the Democratic sponsors, he’s left with a bill he likely won’t be able to get through the committee.

“I’m trying to get a bill passed right now,” the Kentucky lawmaker said, throwing his hands up in the air.

“I told my Republican members I would get as many co-sponsors as Katie got, because I want this to be truly bipartisan, because if it’s going to become law, it’s going to have to be bipartisan, right? So I said, ‘If you get four, I’ll get four. If you get none, I won’t have any,’” Comer said.

Where, then, did the Democrats go?

We’re supposed to buy that, on the eve of this bill beginning to move forward, three Democrats just happened to realize it didn’t strike their fancy.

It had nothing to do with a recently convicted first son who also faces tax charges that stem, in large part, from income derived from foreign sources. It had nothing to do with the fact that we’re five months out from an election.

No, they were just doing their job.

If you buy that, Hunter Biden has a great deal for you on the Brooklyn Bridge. He sits on the board, you know.


A Note from Our Deputy Managing Editor:

 

I heard a chilling comment the other day: “We don’t even know if an election will be held in 2024.” 

 

That wasn’t said by a conspiracy theorist or a doomsday prophet. No, former U.S. national security advisor Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn said that to the founder of The Western Journal, Floyd Brown.

 

Gen. Flynn’s warning means that the 2024 election is the most important election for every single living American. If we lose this one to the wealthy elites who hate us, hate God, and hate what America stands for, we can only assume that 248 years of American history and the values we hold dear to our hearts may soon vanish.

 

The end game is here, and as Benjamin Franklin said, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”

 

All of this means that without you, it’s over. We have the platform, the journalists, and the experience to fight back hard, but Big Tech is strangling us through advertising blacklists, shadow bans, and algorithms. Did you know that we’ve been blacklisted by 90% of advertisers? Without direct support from you, our readers, we can’t continue the fight.

 

Can we count on your support? It may not seem like much, but a Western Journal Membership can make all the difference in the world because when you support us directly, you cut Big Tech out of the picture. They lose control. 

 

A monthly Western Journal Membership costs less than one coffee and breakfast sandwich each month, and it gets you access to ALL of our content — news, commentary, and premium articles. You’ll experience a radically reduced number of ads, and most importantly you will be vitally supporting the fight for America’s soul in 2024.

 

We are literally counting on you because without our members, The Western Journal would cease to exist. Will you join us in the fight? 

 

Sincerely,

Josh Manning

Deputy Managing Editor

The Western Journal

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , , , , ,
Share
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014. Aside from politics, he enjoys spending time with his wife, literature (especially British comic novels and modern Japanese lit), indie rock, coffee, Formula One and football (of both American and world varieties).
Birthplace
Morristown, New Jersey
Education
Catholic University of America
Languages Spoken
English, Spanish
Topics of Expertise
American Politics, World Politics, Culture




Conversation