Commentary

Bombshell Google Leak: 'Users Behaving Badly' Justifies Censorship

Another leak from inside Google shows how the company justifies censoring users, which continues the trend of big tech companies trying to silence opinions they disagree with.

An 85-page document called “The Good Censor” leaked from within Google and published by Breitbart, shows the considerations Google makes when deciding to censor users.

The title of the document should be enough to terrify anyone. The title implies that censorship could be a good thing.

According to Breitbart, “an official Google source said the document should be considered internal research, and not an official company position.” Maybe so, but that’s not very comforting.

In the document, Google justifies censorship online by outlining how users are “behaving badly.”

Trending:
Megan Rapinoe Comes Under Fire After Racist Comment from Her Past Surfaces

One of the bad behaviors prominently listed is “trolling.”

“By provoking arguments and flaming disruption, trolls threaten valuable debate and infuriate users. The problem has become so rampant that several websites have even resorted to removing comments entirely,” the document states.

It seems like Google is afraid of users freely debating online.

The beauty of the internet is the ability to debate with any random lunatic who has any random viewpoint while having the freedom to get up and walk away from your computer at any point.

Should people be able to speak freely on the internet?

If someone is “infuriated” because of a differing opinion, that’s not a reason to censor the internet. The “infuriated” party can just walk away from the computer. It’s quite simple.

Google also makes the claim that “rational debate” is diminished when “authoritative voices” have an equal weight as everyone else’s voices.

“And rational debate is damaged when authoritative voices and ‘have a go’ commentators receive equal weighing,” the document states.

This is worrisome. Google seems to be expressing desire to suppress opinions that aren’t “authoritative.” Furthermore, who is to decide who the “authoritative” voices are?

This newly released document seems to fall in line with Google’s plan of action outlined in a secret meeting shortly after President Donald Trump was elected in 2016.

Related:
Pro-BLM Dem Senator's Hypocrisy Gets Exposed When He's Confronted About His Membership in All-White Club

In 2016, Google leadership cried about how “offensive” Trump was and promised to advance Google’s values.

Other big tech companies like Facebook and Twitter have already started their censorship.

Considering the abuse coming their way from big tech companies, it’s not a surprise that conservatives around the world are calling for more transparency and less censorship on the internet.

Nigel Farage, former leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party, has been particularly vocal about censorship from big tech companies.

“We need a Social Media Bill of Rights to protect free speech online,” Farage wrote on Twitter in August.

It’s becoming increasingly obvious that something needs to be done to protect all voices and speech online.

Instead of trying to censor users who are “behaving badly,” big tech and the left should try leaving their safe spaces and engaging in debate.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



loading

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , ,
Malachi Bailey is a writer from Ohio with a background in history, education and philosophy. He has led multiple conservative groups and is dedicated to the principles of free speech, privacy and peace.
Malachi Bailey is a writer from Ohio with a passion for free speech, privacy and peace. He graduated from the College of Wooster with a B.A. in History. While at Wooster, he served as the Treasurer for the Wooster Conservatives and the Vice President for the Young Americans for Liberty.
Topics of Expertise
Politics, History




loading

Conversation