Share
News

Dems Push Gun Control After Police Mass Shooting, But Felon Shooter Couldn't Legally Own Guns

Share

An 8-hour active shooter standoff that ended at 12:30 a.m. Thursday in Philadelphia and wounded 6 police officers has Democrats at the local, state and federal levels calling for immediate action in the way of gun control legislation.

According to The Philadelphia Inquirer, however, alleged shooter Maurice Hill had a lengthy criminal history prior to Wednesday night’s mass shooting that would have legally barred him from purchasing or possessing a firearm.

The standoff began in the late afternoon as Philadelphia Police Department officers responded to a narcotics incident in the city’s Nicetown-Tioga neighborhood, KYW-TV reported.

Trending:
Boeing Investigating After Discovery on New Air Force One Jet

By 4:30 p.m., shots had been fired and a police perimeter was soon established, with several officers trapped inside shooter’s residence.

The 31-year-old Hill fired a number of shots, barricading himself inside the residence until early the next morning, when he finally surrendered to authorities. No officers were killed.

In light of two horrific mass shootings which took the lives of more than 30 people in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, in recent weeks, Democratic politicians have had no reservations lumping this shooting in with the rest — and using it to justify gun rights restrictions.

Despite recent anti-police rhetoric (accusing cops of murder in the 2014 shooting of Michael Brown) 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren was one of the first to use the injured officers to push the anti-gun narrative.

“We don’t have to live like this. We must pass gun reform laws to end the gun violence epidemic—now,” the Massachusetts senator wrote on Twitter, even before Hill had surrendered himself to the authorities.

Philadelphia’s Democratic Mayor Jim Kenney jumped on that bandwagon as well, USA Today reported, telling politicians at every level to “step up or step aside.”

“Our officers deserve to be protected and they don’t deserve to be shot at by a guy, for hours, with an unlimited supply of weapons and an unlimited supply of bullets,” Kenney told reporters. “It’s disgusting. And we’ve got to do something about it.”

According to reports from The Inquirer and the Washington Examiner, however, no legislation not already on the books federally or in Pennsylvania could have stopped Wednesday’s mass shooting.

Related:
European Nation Bucks EU and Follows in America's Footsteps, Approves Constitutional Amendment Enshrining Right to Bear Arms

Hill should never have been in possession of a firearm in the first place, the outlets reported.

Court documents show Hill has been arrested numerous times since he turned 18 in 2001, racking up nearly a dozen arrests in several states and being convicted of six felonies — some state and some federal.

Hill has served multiple prison terms, “including a 55-month sentence in 2010” the Examiner reported.

According to the Giffords Law Center, several of Hill’s convictions would bar him from legal possession of a firearm under both Pennsylvania state law and the federal Gun Control Act of 1968.

Do you think the Democrats are purposely dishonest about gun control?

Those charges include a felony conviction for aggravated assault and, ironically, federal firearms violations.

Hill was reportedly sentenced to more than four years in federal prison in 2008 for possession of a “Smith & Wesson .357 revolver and a Taurus PT .45 semi-automatic, which he was not lawfully allowed to possess due to his prior felony convictions,” the Examiner reported.

Even before that, The Inquirer noted, Hill’s first arrest involved the confiscation of a firearm with an illegally altered serial number.

Thank goodness the gun control laws already on the books are being enforced in an effective manner.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



loading

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , , , , ,
Share
Andrew J. Sciascia was the supervising editor of features at The Western Journal. Having joined up as a regular contributor of opinion in 2018, he went on to cover the Barrett confirmation and 2020 presidential election for the outlet, regularly co-hosting its video podcast, "WJ Live," as well.
Andrew J. Sciascia was the supervising editor of features at The Western Journal and regularly co-hosted the outlet's video podcast, "WJ Live."

Sciascia first joined up with The Western Journal as a regular contributor of opinion in 2018, before graduating with a degree in criminal justice and political science from the University of Massachusetts Lowell, where he served as editor-in-chief of the student newspaper and worked briefly as a political operative with the Massachusetts Republican Party.

He covered the Barrett confirmation and 2020 presidential election for The Western Journal. His work has also appeared in The Daily Caller.




loading

Conversation