California Sen. Kamala Harris, the running mate of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, indicated she might not take a COVID-19 vaccine touted by President Donald Trump.
In a preview of an interview with CNN’s Dana Bash that is set to air Sunday, Harris suggested she may not take such a vaccine if it is approved prior to the November election.
Bash asked Harris, “Do you trust that, in the situation where we’re in now, that the public health experts and the scientists will get the last word on the efficacy of a vaccine?”
“If past is prologue that they will not, they’ll be muzzled, they’ll be suppressed, they will be sidelined,” Harris said.
“Because [Trump is] looking at an election coming up in less than 60 days and he’s grasping for whatever he can get to pretend he has been a leader on this issue when he is not.”
Bash then asked Harris whether, if “there is a vaccine that is approved and even distributed before the election,” she would get it.
“I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump and it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he’s talking about,” she concluded.
“I will not take his word for it.”
Democratic vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris said that she would not trust President Trump alone on any potential coronavirus vaccine.
— CNN (@CNN) September 5, 2020
The stance could be viewed as a problematic one for Harris, as there is a notion that Democrats believe life cannot return to a pre-pandemic level of normality until a safe vaccine is available.
A refusal to take such a vaccine by Biden or his running mate simply because it was touted by the president could be viewed as politically motivated and might encourage others to avoid an effective vaccine.
The statements made by Harris are already being challenged online:
It’s like CNN is rooting for the vaccine to not work and discouraging people from getting it, seeing as how there will not be any condemnatory and/or snarky pushback on Kamala’s anti-vaxxer line to Dana Bash.
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) September 5, 2020
I love how the left always owns themselves.
They won’t take a vaccine because Trump has something to do with it.
I thought the vaccine program was full-proof and backed by science?
Shouldn’t vaccines not be approved unless fully healthy and safe?
They’re anti-vaxxers now. ?
— Ben Jammin ?? (@xBenJamminx) September 5, 2020
This might be the most dangerous and reckless thing Kamala has done yet and deserves to be widely condemned.
Lots of people expressed concern over polls showing Americans might not take a vaccine. Well now the Dems VP candidate is trying to add to that. https://t.co/Y0IZyPWdur
— Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) September 5, 2020
There are going to be Americans who refuse to get the coronavirus vaccine because Joe Biden and Kamala Harris convinced them not to. https://t.co/kRie9IZXZL
— Andrew Clark (@AndrewHClark) September 5, 2020
*notable anti-vaxxer kamala harris has entered the chat* https://t.co/xn72g76pbY
— Kyle Kashuv (@KyleKashuv) September 5, 2020
Kamala Harris is anti vaccine. Did not see this plot twist coming. https://t.co/JTE3QxXo9d
— JT Lewis (@thejtlewis) September 5, 2020
There is no evidence that the president’s word on a vaccine is not credible, or that Trump would interfere with science, as Harris asserted in the interview.
In a report about the upcoming interview, CNN quoted Moncef Slaoui, the operation’s chief adviser, saying he would not tolerate political interference or pressure in the creation of a coronavirus vaccine.
”I have to say there has been absolutely no interference,” Slaoui said in regard to Operation Warp Speed’s work.
Slaoui has also said that if there were any such interference, he would resign.
NPR reported such a vaccine could be distributed within two months.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have sent states guidelines on how they can be prepared to distribute a vaccine as soon as Nov. 1.
Trump has said he is hopeful a vaccine can be available before the end of the year.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.