Maxine Waters Hates Trump So Much, She’s Siding with Iran


On Thursday, Iran shot down a United States drone, allegedly in international waters.

The downing of the unmanned surveillance plane, worth $110 million, brought the two countries dangerously close to war. In an interview with NBC’s Chuck Todd, Trump said that there were no planes in the air for a retaliatory strike “but they would have been pretty soon, and things would have happened to a point where you would not turn back, you could not turn back.”

“Nothing was green-lighted until the very end because things change,” Trump said. “I didn’t think it was proportionate.”

Later on the same day that interview aired, Rep. Maxine Waters decided she was going to take Iran’s side in the matter.

White House Interns Send Demand Letter to Biden: 'We Will No Longer Remain Silent'

“Trump, you get no credit for so-called stopping the strike against Iran,” the California Democrat tweeted.

“Why was the unmanned drone in Iran’s airspace? Why the surveillance? Don’t provoke and then pretend innocence.”

So, let’s start with the facts: The Pentagon says the drone wasn’t over Iran’s territorial waters. Here’s the path that it was apparently taking:

Iran’s National Guard has claimed that the drone was over its airspace. A top aide to Vladimir Putin has also claimed Russia had intelligence backing that up. The Putin aide had also said, Reuters reported, that “evidence presented by the United States alleging Iran was behind attacks on ships in the Gulf of Oman was poor quality and unprofessional.” That’s basically the only two voices backing up Iran’s side of the story.

Waters is telling us, essentially, that she believes Iran and Russia more than she believes the Pentagon. This certainly says something.

Do you think President Trump deserves credit for averting war in Iran?

Also speaking volumes: The fact that Waters believes surveillance against Iran is unnecessary.

LA Business Owner Turns on Democrats After Becoming Victim of Burglary: 'I'm Sick of It'

As the Middle East and North Africa editor at Jane’s Defence Weekly told CNN after the attacks, Iran’s military prowess has increased considerably in recent years. “They work,” Jeremy Binnie said of Iran’s air defense system, saying that the shoot down “highlights that when the Iranians really make investment, it can really count.”

“We knew that with ballistic missiles, but it appears the case with air defenses too.”

Beyond building up their military capabilities, Iran is also poised in a matter of days to break through limits set by the nuclear deal on how much low-enriched uranium it was allowed to stockpile. Tehran has essentially used this projected breach of the agreement to force the European countries still in the compact to give the country a better deal and provide relief from American sanctions.

Is this not a nation that Maxine Waters believes needs to be surveilled?

When it comes to provocations, those are both pretty significant. Thus, a chant of “Death to America” that Iranian parliamentarians struck up after the national body’s speaker called President Trump the “real world terrorist” during a Sunday session, as Reuters reported. This is the side that Rep. Waters believes is more believable than our own Pentagon?

No, probably not. What she wants is material to condemn the president with. Anything will do — including, it seems, the shooting down of an American drone.

Thankfully, responses to this tweet showed just how ridiculous it was:

When she comes up with evidence that it was over Iranian waters, that the president knew about the flight and that it was deliberately done to provoke the Iranians, fine.

Until then, this is wild speculation aimlessly engaged in to smear the other side. In other words, par for the course when it comes to Maxine Waters.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

, , , , ,
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014. Aside from politics, he enjoys spending time with his wife, literature (especially British comic novels and modern Japanese lit), indie rock, coffee, Formula One and football (of both American and world varieties).
Morristown, New Jersey
Catholic University of America
Languages Spoken
English, Spanish
Topics of Expertise
American Politics, World Politics, Culture