Share
News

Mike Pence: Nancy Pelosi Hit 'a New Low' by Ripping Up State of the Union

Share

Vice President Mike Pence is making his displeasure known regarding Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s destruction of an official copy of the State of the Union address Tuesday night before a joint session of Congress.

Appearing the following morning on Fox News’ “Fox and Friends,” the vice president ripped Pelosi in return, referring to her behavior in the closing moments of President Donald Trump’s remarks to the nation as petty and self-centered.

“I didn’t see [Pelosi] do it. I found out just a few moments later,” Pence said. “And I think it was a new low.

“I wasn’t sure if she was ripping up the speech or ripping up the Constitution.”



Coming after more than a year of emotionally charged working relations between Trump and Pelosi, Tuesday’s address was conceived and carried to term with no shortage of expectation that tensions might flare between the two partisan leaders.

Pelosi’s very invitation for Trump to come before Congress and deliver remarks on the nation’s health, as the U.S. Constitution and years of tradition demand, arrived on the president’s desk in December as the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives hurriedly prepared its case for impeachment.

Trending:
'Bang, Bang. They Dead': The Last Person Parents Would Expect Just Threatened to Shoot Up a School

And despite the now-forgone conclusion that Trump will be acquitted by the U.S. Senate come Wednesday afternoon, relations between the two remain strained — and seemed to leave the president passing on an attempt to shake hands with Pelosi prior to his address.

The pot would not boil over, however, until more than an hour later, when Pelosi took it upon herself to physically tear apart a printed copy of the speech behind the president’s back as cameras rolled on his closing remarks.

Asked about the incident shortly after the joint session was adjourned, Pelosi defended her dramatic reaction as tame, according to The Daily Wire, telling reporters, “It was the courteous thing to do, considering the alternative.”

The House speaker would further justify the response in a series of interviews, claiming Trump’s speech had been “a manifesto of mistruths.”

Related:
Mike Pence Shares How He and Trump Parted Ways After the Jan. 6 Capitol Incursion

According to the wider viewing audience and the diverse cast of American citizens and veterans spotlighted in the address, however, the action was simply disrespectful.

For Pence, it juxtaposed a leader focused on self-image and small political victories with a leader focused on seeing the nation glorified.

“It’s clear, the contrast here was a president who spent an hour-and-a-half making a speech about America,” Pence said. “And Nancy Pelosi, in the final moments, tried to make it about her.”

Do you agree with Pence that Pelosi's behavior was a 'new low'?

“I think the American people see through it,” the vice president continued. “They see through the pettiness. They see through the politics of all of it.”

“I think what they got last night was a speech that lifted up the country, that celebrated the incredible progress that we’ve made in our economy, rebuilding our military, strengthening our courts,” he added. “But the stories, the stories that the president told were American stories.

“And I just know it was a great, great blessing to the people all across America.”

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , , , , , ,
Share
Andrew J. Sciascia was the supervising editor of features at The Western Journal. Having joined up as a regular contributor of opinion in 2018, he went on to cover the Barrett confirmation and 2020 presidential election for the outlet, regularly co-hosting its video podcast, "WJ Live," as well.
Andrew J. Sciascia was the supervising editor of features at The Western Journal and regularly co-hosted the outlet's video podcast, "WJ Live."

Sciascia first joined up with The Western Journal as a regular contributor of opinion in 2018, before graduating with a degree in criminal justice and political science from the University of Massachusetts Lowell, where he served as editor-in-chief of the student newspaper and worked briefly as a political operative with the Massachusetts Republican Party.

He covered the Barrett confirmation and 2020 presidential election for The Western Journal. His work has also appeared in The Daily Caller.




Conversation

The Western Journal is pleased to bring back comments to our articles! Due to threatened de-monetization by Big Tech, we had temporarily removed comments, but we have now implemented a solution to bring back the conversation that Big Tech doesn't want you to have. If you have any problems using the new commenting platform, please contact customer support at commenting-help@insticator.com. Welcome back!