Shapiro: The Left's Response to Will Smith's Slap Is More Frightening Than You Realize
This week, Will Smith — perhaps the most bankable star of his generation — won the Oscar for Best Actor. But that wasn’t why he made headlines.
He made headlines because, during the Academy Awards ceremony on Sunday, comedian Chris Rock told a joke about Smith’s wife, Jada Pinkett Smith. Jada, it seems, suffers from alopecia; Rock, presumably unaware of her condition, joked about her starring in “G.I. Jane 2,” a nod to her closely shaven head. Initially, Will laughed. Then he glanced around and saw that Jada was upset.
At which point he got up, strode to the stage and proceeded to slap Rock directly across the face.
Then he sat down again.
Rock, for his part, tried to play the situation off as a joke. But Will Smith wasn’t letting it go. Instead, he began screaming at Rock, “Keep my wife’s name out of your f***ing mouth!” Rock replied, “Wow, dude, it was a ‘G.I. Jane’ joke.” To which Smith repeated, “Keep my wife’s name out of your f***ing mouth!” Which, presumably, would make Rock the first man to whom Smith had ever uttered such a sentiment, given the couple’s stated dedication to their open marriage.
Suffice it to say, it was perhaps the oddest incident in nationally televised history. Its only rivals might be Justin Timberlake ripping off Janet Jackson’s top at the Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show, or the live O.J. Simpson car chase during the NBA Finals. But this event was even odder given the utterly sudden nature of the assault. Rock, after all, was hired to lightly roast actors. Will Smith was there to pick up his first Oscar. And the whole thing devolved into actual violence.
It’s easy to brush off the incident as yet another disposably silly celebrity moment. It would be easier if Democratic Rep. Ayanna Pressley hadn’t immediately tweeted (and then deleted), “Thank you [Will Smith] Shout out to all the husbands who defend their wives living with alopecia in the face of daily ignorance & insults.” Or if Democratic Rep. Jamaal Bowman hadn’t tweeted (and then deleted), “Teachable Moment: Don’t joke about a Black Woman’s hair.”
Or if the entire Academy Awards audience hadn’t given Smith a standing ovation a few moments later. Or if there hadn’t been widespread support for Smith’s slap online, thanks to the now-common belief that verbal insults constitute a form of aggression to which violence is an acceptable — indeed, commendable — response.
The social compact by which verbiage and violence remain strictly separated is a delicate one. For most of human history, words were treated as punishable by physical response — dueling was commonplace in societies for centuries, as was familial retaliation for insults, and wars were even fought over verbal slights.
But over time, civilized people traded away the privilege of the personal use of force in favor of rules; truly offensive words could sometimes meet with social disapproval or even ostracization, but certainly not violence.
Now we seem to be reversing the trend. The entire theory of “microaggressions” suggests that if you are offended, it is because someone has “aggressed” against you — and aggression requires a response. To deny someone’s preferred pronouns is now an act of “erasure” amounting to violence, since the person so slighted might feel damaged in his sense of worth or authenticity.
Once we reconnect the severed link between words and violence, civilization will begin to break down.
We can hope that Will Smith’s slap remains an aberration; a country in which comedians are assaulted for making jokes will be a rather humorless place. But unless Americans are willing to re-establish the barrier between words and violence, we will become a far more silent and far more violent nation.
© 2022 CREATORS.COM
The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
