Share
Commentary

Ocasio-Cortez Caught in Another Big Lie, This Time About Law and Past Crime

Share

Democratic congressional candidate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said in an interview Wednesday that the U.S. did not add criminal penalties to immigration law until about 1999.

Verdict: False

The U.S. criminalized unlawful entry in 1929. Laws passed in the 1990s intensified criminal penalties relating to immigration.

Fact Check: Ocasio-Cortez defeated incumbent Rep. Joseph Crowley, one of the top Democrats in the House, in a New York primary Tuesday. She is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America and has called to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Ocasio-Cortez elaborated on her reasons to abolish ICE on NPR’s “Morning Edition” Wednesday. “What we’re really talking about is re-imagining immigration to be humane,” she said. “It wasn’t until about 1999 that we chose to criminalize immigration at all, and then once ICE was established we really kind of militarized that enforcement to a degree that was previously unseen in the United States.”

Trending:
Biden Calls for Record-High Taxes ... We're Closing in on a 50% Rate

Congress made unauthorized entry into the U.S. a criminal offense in 1929. Aliens who entered the country outside a port of entry or without examination by immigration officials could be charged with a misdemeanor. Previously deported aliens who tried to re-enter the country without authorization could be charged with a felony.

Unauthorized entry and unauthorized re-entry remain misdemeanor and felony charges today.

Before 1929, unauthorized entry was against the law, but not criminalized. Early immigration laws like the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, Immigration Act of 1882 and the Immigration Act of 1891 restricted entry for certain classes of people — like Chinese people or any “convict, lunatic or idiot” — and created standards for deportation.

President Bill Clinton signed two bills into law in 1996 that vastly increased the number of criminal offenses associated with illegal immigration: the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) and the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA).

Does the left intentionally mislead people regarding immigration law?

“Clinton’s laws (IIRIRA and AEDPA) were I’m sure what Ocasio-Cortez was referring to and are indeed the moment when immigration was ‘criminalized’ both in practice and in the public imagination. That is, immigration violations were tied much more tightly to criminal law,” Avi Chomsky, a history professor at Salem State University, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an email.

IIRIRA and AEDPA intensified penalties for immigration-related crimes and increased the number of criminal convictions that could trigger deportations or make aliens ineligible for asylum or other relief. Before 1996, aliens would have to receive a sentence of at least five years to be considered an “aggravated felon.” IIRIRA expanded the definition of “aggravated felony” for immigration purposes to include non-violent crimes that are classified as misdemeanors in other contexts.

The Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which became ICE, was created in 2003 as part of the new Department of Homeland Security. Before that, the now-defunct Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) was responsible for both overseeing legal immigration and deporting illegal immigrants. With the new enforcement agency, along with IIRIRA and AEDPA, the U.S. started formally removing far more people in the 2000s than ever before.

While unauthorized entry carries criminal charges, remaining in the country illegally is not a criminal offense.

“‘Unlawful presence’ is different from ‘unlawful entry,’” Madeline Hsu, a history professor at the University of Texas at Austin, told TheDCNF in an email. “Unlawful presence is neither a felony nor a misdemeanor but a civil infraction that results in removal and a bar on re-entry for a certain period of time.”

Related:
Democrats Run Focus Groups to Figure Out Why People Don't Like Kamala Harris and End Up Learning the Brutal Truth

Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment about her statement.

A version of this article appeared on The Daily Caller News Foundation website. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , ,
Share
Founded by Tucker Carlson, a 25-year veteran of print and broadcast media, and Neil Patel, former chief policy adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney, The Daily Caller News Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit providing original investigative reporting from a team of professional reporters that operates for the public benefit. Photo credit: @DailyCaller on Twitter




Conversation