Share
News

Judge Strikes Major Part of US Women's Soccer Case After Discovering Men's Team Is Actually Paid Less

Share

The U.S. women’s national soccer team suffered a rare but devastating defeat on Friday after a judge rejected claims that the female soccer players were paid less than men.

The court ruling prompted presumptive Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden to post a Twitter threat to the U.S. Soccer Federation that it should give the women what they want or face his wrath.

Judge R. Gary Klausner of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled in favor of the U.S. Soccer Federation in a case that had its roots in a 2015 compliant from the women that they were underpaid compared to male players.

“The WNT [Women’s National Team] has been paid more on both a cumulative and an average per-game basis than the MNT [Men’s National Team] over the class period,” Klausner ruled, according to a Reuters report supplemented by the U.K. Daily Mail.

The judge ruled that the women “have not demonstrated a triable issue that WNT players are paid less than MNT players,” according to ESPN.

Trending:
Camera Catches Biden's Cheat Sheet for Meeting with Iraq PM, Shows Embarrassing Directions to Guide Him

The ruling called it an undisputed fact that from 2015 to 2019, the women’s national team averaged $220,747 per game in total payments (for a total of $24.5 million), while the men’s national team averaged $212,639 per game in total payments (for a total of $18.5 million).

The ruling also said that the women rejected a collective bargaining agreement that would have been the same as that of male players, according to CNN.

Women are paid whether they play a match or not, the ruling noted. Men are paid only when they are called into camp to play and then do so, the ruling said.

Klausner said it appeared the women were claiming that they should have been paid more because the contract deal for the men was better.

Are you tired of well-paid athletes who always want more?

“This approach — merely comparing what each team would have made under the other team’s CBA — is untenable in this case because it ignores the reality that the MNT and WNT bargained for different agreements which reflect different preferences, and that the WNT explicitly rejected the terms they now seek to retroactively impose on themselves,” Klausner wrote. “This evidence is insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact for trial.”

The players said the decision will be appealed.

“We are shocked and disappointed with today’s decision, but we will not give up our hard work for equal pay,” Molly Levinson, a spokeswoman for the players, wrote on Twitter. “We are confident in our case and steadfast in our commitment to ensuring that girls and women who play this sport will not be valued as lesser just because of their gender. We have learned that there are tremendous obstacles to change; we know that it takes bravery and courage and perseverance to stand up to them. We will appeal and press on.”

Related:
Referee Forced to Halt Mexico vs. US Championship Game Twice Due to Behavior of Mexico Fans

Biden weighed in as well.

Biden’s comment earned him some pushback on Twitter.

U.S. Soccer issued a statement in response to the ruling, according to The New York Times.

“We look forward to working with the women’s national team to chart a positive path forward to grow the game both here at home and around the world,” the statement said. “U.S. Soccer has long been the world leader for the women’s game on and off the field, and we are committed to continuing that work to ensure our women’s national team remains the best in the world and sets the standard for women’s soccer.”

The equal pay contention was one piece of the lawsuit filed by the women again U.S. Soccer. The judge ruled that female players’ claims that they are not treated equally in areas such as travel, training, and housing could go forward.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , ,
Share
Jack Davis is a freelance writer who joined The Western Journal in July 2015 and chronicled the campaign that saw President Donald Trump elected. Since then, he has written extensively for The Western Journal on the Trump administration as well as foreign policy and military issues.
Jack Davis is a freelance writer who joined The Western Journal in July 2015 and chronicled the campaign that saw President Donald Trump elected. Since then, he has written extensively for The Western Journal on the Trump administration as well as foreign policy and military issues.
Jack can be reached at jackwritings1@gmail.com.
Location
New York City
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Foreign Policy, Military & Defense Issues




Conversation