Share
News

Letitia James and James Comey Indictments in Jeopardy as They Challenge Legality of Prosecutor's Appointment

Share

New York Attorney General Letitia James and former FBI Director James Comey are teaming up by taking aim at U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, the federal prosecutor who brought indictments against each.

A hearing on their challenge will take place next month.

On Thursday, James’s representation filed a sparsely worded two-page notice of her intent to fight her banking fraud charge by having Halligan removed, according to CNN.

“Please take notice that on October 24, 2025, Letitia James, by counsel, will file her motion to dismiss the indictment that challenges the unlawful appointment of the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Lindsey Halligan,” the court filing said.

A footnote noted that Comey is also trying to get out from under his indictment by questioning Halligan’s appointment and said “the two motions should likely be consolidated.”

Prosecutors allege that James bought a house in Virginia saying she would use it as a second home when she instead used it as a revenue-generating investment property, according to CBS News.

James has pleaded not guilty to the charge.

Comey claimed that Halligan was “defectively appointed to her office.”

Halligan was appointed after the U.S. Attorney, Erik Siebert for the Eastern District of Virginia resigned.

Comey’s lawyers have said that because an interim U.S. attorney was in the job longer than the 120-day period allowed, Halligan’s appointment was not valid.

Related:
Federal Judge Rules Trump DOJ Can Release Disputed Ghislaine Maxwell Grand Jury Materials

Comey has been accused of making false statements to Congress and obstruction of justice. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges.

Comey has a Nov. 13 hearing scheduled on his efforts to have the indictment thrown out, according to The Hill.

That hearing is scheduled before U.S. District Judge Cameron Currie, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton who sits on the U.S. District Court for South Carolina.

Currie was picked by an appeals-level court that oversees both her district and the Eastern District of Virginia, which is where Comey and James were charged.

“It is appropriate to reassign such a disqualification motion outside the pertinent district because the judges of the district have a conflict of interest,” Andrew C. McCarthy wrote in National Review.

“Besides working on various cases in which the government is a party (cases that the district U.S. attorney supervises), the judges of the district could be asked to vote on whether an interim U.S. attorney can remain in her position after the statutory 120-day interim term has expired,” he added.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , ,
Share
Jack Davis is a freelance writer who joined The Western Journal in July 2015 and chronicled the campaign that saw President Donald Trump elected. Since then, he has written extensively for The Western Journal on the Trump administration as well as foreign policy and military issues.
Jack Davis is a freelance writer who joined The Western Journal in July 2015 and chronicled the campaign that saw President Donald Trump elected. Since then, he has written extensively for The Western Journal on the Trump administration as well as foreign policy and military issues.
Jack can be reached at jackwritings1@gmail.com.
Location
New York City
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Foreign Policy, Military & Defense Issues




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.

Conversation