Share
News

Supreme Court Ruling Will Be Key to Citizenship Question on 2020 Census

Share

The U.S. Supreme Court announced Friday that it will hear a challenge to the citizenship question the Trump administration inserted into the 2020 census.

The case does not concern the merits of the dispute over the citizenship question. Rather, the high court will decide which evidence the trial court may consider before issuing its ruling.

The high court previously intervened to stop Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross’ scheduled deposition in the case on Oct. 22.

The U.S. Census Bureau falls under the supervision of the Commerce Department.

The Trump administration had asked the justices to delay the trial altogether, though that request was rejected on Nov. 2.

Trending:
Buttigieg's Port Visit Blows Up in His Face When People Notice What Was Lurking Over His Shoulder

The trial has since unfolded and is nearly completed, pending a final decision about Ross’ deposition.

The Constitution mandates a census every 10 years to apportion seats in the House of Representatives among the states. Population is also used as the basis by which federal aid is granted.

A coalition of Democratic states, mayors and interest groups challenged the inclusion of the citizenship question, fearing it will discourage minority participation, thereby stripping liberal enclaves of federal monies and congressional representation.

In lawsuits of this nature, the relevant department typically turns over the body of official writings generated in the course of the government’s decision-making. This trove of documents, called the administrative record, is generally the only evidence courts use to decide the case.

However, U.S. District Court Judge Jesse Furman allowed discovery beyond the administrative record, when evidence emerged that Ross inserted the citizenship question for political reasons.

The question now before the justices is whether that decision was correct.

In a filing at the high court, the Justice Department argues that Ross’ subjective motivations are irrelevant.

“This Court has long recognized that an agency decision-maker’s mental processes are generally irrelevant to evaluating the legality of agency action,” the filing reads. “So, too, has this Court recognized that compelling the testimony of a high-ranking government official — especially a member of the president’s cabinet — is rarely, if ever, justified.”

The American Civil Liberties Union, which opposes the citizenship question, said the Supreme Court should allow consideration of all evidence bearing on the Commerce Department’s decision.

Related:
Here Are the Justices Who Handed Biden a Win for His Vaccine Mandate for Health Care Workers

“The Trump administration is terrified of having to explain on the record why it added a census citizenship question and has repeatedly tried to shield Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross from answering questions under oath,” said Dale Ho, director of the ACLU’s voting rights project. “All relevant evidence should be considered. The record is clear that the administration added the citizenship question to intimidate immigrant communities.”

The justices will hear arguments in the case on Feb. 19.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

A version of this article appeared on The Daily Caller News Foundation website.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , ,
Share
Founded by Tucker Carlson, a 25-year veteran of print and broadcast media, and Neil Patel, former chief policy adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney, The Daily Caller News Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit providing original investigative reporting from a team of professional reporters that operates for the public benefit.




Conversation

The Western Journal is pleased to bring back comments to our articles! Due to threatened de-monetization by Big Tech, we had temporarily removed comments, but we have now implemented a solution to bring back the conversation that Big Tech doesn't want you to have. If you have any problems using the new commenting platform, please contact customer support at commenting-help@insticator.com. Welcome back!