Path 27
Commentary

Bartiromo: Mind-Boggling We Can't Find $25 Billion for Wall in $47 Trillion 10-Year Budget

Path 27

Following passage of the $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill by Congress, there was an outcry by conservatives — as well as the president — about the glut of wasteful spending contained within the package.

A big source of consternation was that Congress was able to find plenty of taxpayer money to spend on a variety of programs and projects favored by the left, but claimed to be incapable of finding the $25 billion sought by President Donald Trump to fully fund construction of the border wall.

As reported by The Hill, the anger over wasteful spending on non-priority items has led the Trump administration to propose a request for $15 billion worth of rescissions, a “clawing back” of unspent funds sitting idle from previous appropriations bills that might later be used for other purposes.

On Sunday’s “Fox & Friends,” Fox Business Network host Maria Bartiromo spoke about the rescission request and made a related observation about the lack of funds for the border wall that plenty of conservatives have wondered about themselves.

Trending:
Trump Puts Democrats on Notice with 'Virtually Unprecedented' Midterm Fundraising Haul

“By the way, it is a little mind-boggling that you have a $47 trillion budget over 10 years and you can’t find $25 billion for the wall in that,” Bartiromo said.

Her observation is as correct as it is infuriating for many of Trump’s supporters who are concerned about securing the southern border from illegal immigration, drug and human smuggling and other illicit criminal cartel activity.

The blame for that disconcerting failure on the part of Congress to provide funds for a border wall rests squarely on the shoulders of obstructionist Democrats — as well as a few anti-Trump establishment Republicans — who seem to prefer open borders and a continuation of the flow of illegal immigrants into the country.

Sadly, it doesn’t appear that’s about to change, unless more Republicans in line with the president’s MAGA agenda are elected to Congress, which should be a top priority for Trump’s legion of supporters across the nation in the November midterm elections.

Should rescinded, unspent funds be used for the border wall?

As to the rescission request, Bartiromo noted that Trump had gone so far as to threaten Congress with a shutdown in the fall if they denied both his request to rescind unspent funds and failed to again provide funds for the border wall — a potentially dangerous gambit ahead of the aforementioned elections for both sides of the aisle.

The Hill report pointed out that $15 billion in rescinded funds was barely a drop in the bucket in the big scheme of trillion-dollar budgets, and is likely just the first of such requests to come from the administration.

In fact, there are already reports that the administration is at work drawing up another rescission request totaling roughly $10 billion in unspent funds.

The report also noted that Democrats really had no room to attack the requests either, as they draw almost exclusively from funding that had been previously set aside for certain projects and programs that are defunct, expired or no longer necessary.

Should those requests be passed and the unspent funds clawed back into congressional coffers, $25 billion in unused funds Congress had already considered spent long ago could be reappropriated for the border wall.

Related:
'I Don't Want to Hear a Blip About COVID from You': DeSantis Rips Biden for Ignoring Duty, Failing to Secure Border

As to Bartiromo’s observation, and given that Congress has already divvied up approximately $47 trillion in spending over the next 10 years, why can’t an additional $25 billion in the form of an unplanned windfall be used for the wall?

Congress won’t do that unless it is compelled to, though, so it is incumbent upon constituents and voters to pressure their representatives to come up with the funds for the border wall as soon as possible — if they want to keep their jobs in Congress, that is.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



loading

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , ,
Path 27
Ben Marquis is a writer who identifies as a constitutional conservative/libertarian. He has written about current events and politics for The Western Journal since 2014. His focus is on protecting the First and Second Amendments.
Ben Marquis has written on current events and politics for The Western Journal since 2014. He reads voraciously and writes about the news of the day from a conservative-libertarian perspective. He is an advocate for a more constitutional government and a staunch defender of the Second Amendment, which protects the rest of our natural rights. He lives in Little Rock, Arkansas, with the love of his life as well as four dogs and four cats.
Birthplace
Louisiana
Nationality
American
Education
The School of Life
Location
Little Rock, Arkansas
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics




loading

Conversation