Biden Claims SCOTUS Is in Error, Launches 'Whole-of-Government Effort' Against Latest Ruling


On Thursday, President Joe Biden announced his intention to mobilize the entire federal government in an effort to subvert the Supreme Court’s decision to allow Texas’ newly minted abortion law to go into effect while it’s challenged in court.

The law, which became effective Wednesday, only allows abortion before a fetal heartbeat is detected, which occurs at approximately six weeks into gestation.

Pro-life advocates have noted that these parameters make the Texas law “the strongest pro-life law” in America.

Tragedy Strikes CEO and His Family During Thanksgiving Travel - Only One Survivor Made It Out of Their Car

In a 5-4 decision published Wednesday, the Supreme Court declined to issue an injunction against the law, in a move that Biden described as “an unprecedented assault on a woman’s constitutional rights under Roe v. Wade.”

The majority allowing the law to take effect were Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.

Dissenting were Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonya Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

The majority’s unsigned opinion, and the dissents, are embedded below:

Ruling on Texas Abortion Law by The Western Journal on Scribd

In a statement released by the White House Thursday, Biden announced he is coordinating “a whole-of-government effort to respond to this decision,” which he claims was made in “error.”

“One reason I became the first president in history to create a Gender Policy Council was to be prepared to react to such assaults on women’s rights,” Biden wrote.

“Hence, I am directing that Council and the Office of the White House Counsel to launch a whole-of-government effort to respond to this decision, looking specifically to the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Justice to see what steps the Federal Government can take to ensure that women in Texas have access to safe and legal abortions as protected by Roe, and what legal tools we have to insulate women and providers from the impact of Texas’ bizarre scheme of outsourced enforcement to private parties.”

One of the primary reasons the Supreme Court decided to uphold the law was precisely due to what Biden characterized as a “bizarre scheme of outsourced enforcement.”

Presidential Elections of 1944 and 2024 Have Staggering Similarities

The law circumvents abortion-law precedents such as Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey by placing enforcement in the hands of private individuals.

As the SCOTUSblog summary of the court’s case notes, in order “to make it harder to challenge the law in court” the law “does not rely on government officials to enforce the ban,” instead allowing “private individuals to bring lawsuits against” anyone who helps facilitate an abortion, including abortion providers and anyone who “aids and abets” an abortion.

A successful lawsuit against such parties could lead to an award of as much as $10,000.

Is Biden abusing his power as president?

Despite the court’s decision, the fight over Texas’ abortion ban is far from over.

In Wednesday’s decision, the court majority “acknowledged that the providers had ‘raised serious questions regarding the constitutionality of the Texas law,'” although not enough that they could prevent the law from going into effect.

Pro-abortion advocates, abortion providers and the Democratic party will continue to explore these questions in the coming months as they attempt to overturn Texas‘ new protection of unborn children.

And, if Biden holds true to his word, the entire federal government will be mobilized to do so as well.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

, , , , ,
Michael wrote for a number of entertainment news outlets before joining The Western Journal in 2020 as a staff reporter. He now manages the writing and reporting teams, overseeing the production of commentary, news and original reporting content.
Michael Austin graduated from Iowa State University in 2019. During his time in college, Michael volunteered as a social media influencer for both PragerU and Live Action. After graduation, he went on to work as a freelance journalist for various entertainment news sites before joining The Western Journal in 2020 as a staff reporter.

Since then, Michael has been promoted to the role of Manager of Writing and Reporting. His responsibilities now include managing and directing the production of commentary, news and original reporting content.
Ames, Iowa
Iowa State University
Topics of Expertise
Culture, Faith, Politics, Education, Entertainment