Explosive Report: Flynn Investigation Was Set To Be Closed, Then Strzok Intervened


In the latest black eye for investigators in the Michael Flynn case, new documents suggest the investigation was about to be closed before the intervention of former FBI Counterintelligence Division Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok, who claimed at the time that higher-ups wanted it to stay open.

According to Politico, in early January of 2017, before then-President-Elect Donald Trump took office, the FBI had decided it had no information to conclude that Flynn had acted as an agent of Russia during the 2016 campaign.

The investigation, called “Crossfire Razor,” had come to the point where agents determined that there was no “derogatory” information on Flynn to justify continuing the probe, according to a document Flynn’s lawyers filed in an attempt to rescind the former national security adviser’s guilty plea for lying to the FBI.

“The absence of any derogatory information or lead information from these logical sources reduce the number of investigative avenues and techniques to pursue,” the document stated. “Per the direction of FBI management, Crossfire Razor was not interviewed as part of the case closing procedure. The FBI is closing this investigation.”

Later that afternoon, Strzok intervened.

Man Who Tried to Shoot Rittenhouse and Ended Up Shot Himself Lands in News Again Under His New Name: Report

“Hey, don’t close RAZOR,” Strzok said in a message to an unidentified FBI agent who was the case agent for the Flynn case. Strzok added that “7th floor involved,” meaning that high-level FBI leadership had directed him to do this.

The decision came less than a week after Flynn had spoken by phone to a Russian diplomat.

When Strzok and another FBI agent interviewed Flynn without Flynn’s counsel being present later in January, the newly installed national security adviser gave false information about contacts he had with Russia.

This would eventually end in a guilty plea on Flynn’s part for lying to the FBI. However, after the plea was entered, Flynn’s lawyers started taking a more aggressive stance about FBI misconduct in the case.

Should Flynn's guilty plea be dropped?

Flynn has since argued that he didn’t deliberately lie to investigators and that there was “egregious misconduct” on the part of the FBI.

One handwritten note about how to approach the FBI’s January 2017 interview with Flynn — and whether to confront him with a lie during the interview — set off plenty of alarms with Flynn’s defenders: “What is our goal? Truth/admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?” the note said.

Republicans felt the new documents indicated the Flynn case was a setup.

“Clear now that General Flynn was set up by dirty cops at the highest levels of our government,” House Intelligence Committee ranking member Rep. Devin Nunes tweeted.

DOJ Once Thought It Had Victory Against Trump Ally, Years Later It's Being Forced to Drop the Case and Turn Him Loose

Tucker Carlson, meanwhile, said that “the Flynn story lays bare the architecture of control that has been present just beneath the surface of this country for a long time.”

“For reasons we still don’t fully understand, Michael Flynn deeply offended permanent Washington somehow. So they decided to destroy him,” Carlson said. “They pretended to believe he was a secret Russian agent, and then they entrapped him on a completely bogus perjury charge.”

President Trump, meanwhile, retweeted a Fox News story about the case.

His son, Donald Trump Jr., tweeted that Flynn “did nothing wrong, he needs to be fully exonerated with all charges dropped immediately!”

What’s becoming clearer is that this was a case of gross misconduct on the part of the FBI, a case in which authorities wanted to get someone convicted more than they wanted to serve the interests of justice.

Whether or not Flynn did anything wrong or knowingly lied to the FBI is sort of irrelevant if the prosecutorial misconduct is as gross as it appears to be in this case.

To top it all off, we have the involvement of Peter Strzok, the FBI agent who had a clear political bias but, as we’ve been told a million times before, totally did nothing wrong. Nothing to see here! (Again!)

We’ve been told this too many times. There is a Department of Justice investigation into the FBI’s handling of the Flynn case. There’s always the possibility of a presidential pardon.

Either one of those avenues, at this point, could affect a merciful end to a case too polluted with misconduct to continue.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

, , , , , , ,
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014. Aside from politics, he enjoys spending time with his wife, literature (especially British comic novels and modern Japanese lit), indie rock, coffee, Formula One and football (of both American and world varieties).
Morristown, New Jersey
Catholic University of America
Languages Spoken
English, Spanish
Topics of Expertise
American Politics, World Politics, Culture