Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal Release Was So Bad, Her Staff Took Its Webpage Offline


New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez kicked off Thursday unveiling her highly anticipated “Green New Deal” resolution to cheers from Democrats and environmentalists, but by the day’s end her staff was forced to take offline a gaffe-riddled summary of the bill.

Ocasio-Cortez gave the scoop to National Public Radio. Her office provided NPR the Green New Deal resolution and an accompanying FAQ document that laid out its goals — namely, to “(m)ove America to 100% clean and renewable energy” within 10 years.

What immediately became clear, however, was that the legislative language didn’t match Ocasio-Cortez’s FAQ — in particular, when it came to nuclear power, welfare programs and “farting cows.”

The FAQ document Ocasio-Cortez’s staff gave to NPR reads:

“A Green New Deal is a massive investment in renewable energy production and would not include creating new nuclear plants. It’s unclear if we will be able to decommission every nuclear plant within 10 years, but the plan is to transition off of nuclear and all fossil fuels as soon as possible.”

White House Interns Send Demand Letter to Biden: 'We Will No Longer Remain Silent'

In fact, NPR reported the “ultimate goal is to stop using fossil fuels entirely, Ocasio-Cortez’s office told NPR, as well as to transition away from nuclear energy.”

“Frankly, it does a disservice to the debate,” Jeremy Harrell, policy director at ClearPath, a conservative group that promotes low-emissions energy, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

“Realistically, you can’t decommission a nuclear plant in 10 years,” Harrell told TheDCNF.

“She’s making false promises that aren’t even in the realm of the doable,” he said. “She’s using this to push a liberal agenda.”

Harrell wasn’t the only one to notice the discrepancy.

Mike Shellenberger, founder of the pro-nuclear group Environmental Progress, called for Ocasio-Cortez to clear up the confusion.

Shellenberger pointed to the fact Ocasio-Cortez herself said at a Capitol Hill rally for the Green New Deal that it was about “transitioning to 100 percent renewable energy,” despite the legislative text.

New Book Details Bad Blood Between Pelosi, AOC: 'She Got So Mad at Me'

Energy expert Christopher Clack, who co-authored a comprehensive study on the feasibility of a 100 percent renewable grid, told TheDCNF that while he thought the legislative text was “ambitious and far-reaching,” the FAQ complicated things.

“If they are not wanting newer technologies, and wanting only wind, solar and hydro; as the FAQs represent that would be more problematic,” Clack said, “however, that is not how the bill is written.”

Clack’s study estimated that completely decarbonizing the grid — including the use of nuclear power and carbon capture — would cost somewhere between $20 trillion and $40 trillion by 2050.

Ocasio-Cortez’s staff took out the anti-nuclear language from the FAQ posted on her congressional website.

However, that FAQ page was taken down Thursday afternoon.

GND_FAQ screen shot

But those weren’t the only changes made to the FAQ before it was taken down.

The Green New Deal’s FAQ also explained how the resolution used the term “net-zero emissions, rather than zero emissions” because “we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes that fast.”

Ocasio-Cortez’s staff eventually deleted “farting” from the FAQ, but not before reporters found it.

The FAQ also called for building out highspeed rail “at a scale where air travel stops becoming necessary.”

Democrats were also hard-pressed to explain how Americans would phase out the internal combustion engine and what a world without air travel would look like.

Also included in Ocasio-Cortez’s FAQ was the promise of “(e)conomic security to all who are unable or unwilling to work,” which was also missing from the legislation.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi dismissed the Green New Deal as a “suggestion” and named more members to the House climate change committee — Ocasio-Cortez was not named to the committee.

Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey introduced a companion bill in the Senate Thursday that was co-sponsored by several Democratic 2020 hopefuls.

The Green New Deal’s FAQ at least twice mentioned planting trees as a way to sequester carbon dioxide emissions and fight global warming. In fact, the FAQ says a Green New Deal would mean we “plant lots of trees” to reduce emissions.

“We believe the right way to capture carbon is to plant trees and restore our natural ecosystems. (Carbon capture, utilization and storage) technology to date has not proven effective,” the FAQ says.

“Planting trees is not going to eliminate or reduce emissions from a variety of point sources,” Harrell said. “In the end, you need carbon capture and nuclear to meet emissions goals.”

Ocasio-Cortez’s office did not respond to TheDCNF’s request for comment.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact

A version of this article appeared on The Daily Caller News Foundation website.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

, , , , ,
Founded by Tucker Carlson, a 25-year veteran of print and broadcast media, and Neil Patel, former chief policy adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney, The Daily Caller News Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit providing original investigative reporting from a team of professional reporters that operates for the public benefit. Photo credit: @DailyCaller on Twitter