Economic studies consistently show that higher minimum wages lead to higher unemployment, particularly among teenagers.
But that’s a consequence minimum wage advocates have been willing to accept in exchange for higher incomes for minimum wage workers who keep their jobs.
It turns out, however, that higher minimum wages actually reduced the long-run earnings of teenagers who were exposed to the higher minimum wages.
That’s according to a new study from the Mercatus Center, a nonprofit free market-oriented think tank, which examined the steep decline in teenage employment over the past two decades and, in particular, whether that decline in employment led to higher or lower human capital — in other words, workers’ knowledge and skills — and earnings.
Between 1994 and 2014, labor force participation among 16- to 19-year-olds fell from 53 percent to 34 percent.
That’s a huge decline over a relatively short period of time.
Declining teen employment is important because job experience — even minimum wage experience — can play an important role in workers’ human capital development, which contributes to higher long-run earnings.
Of course, if teens replaced employment with other, more productive activities, such as education and other forms of human capital development, then the decline in teenage employment could be a good thing and not a cause for concern.
To help determine what caused the steep drop in teen employment over the past two decades, the authors — David Neumark and Cortnie Shupe — examined the impact of minimum wage laws, higher returns to schooling and increased immigration.
Minimum wage laws and increased immigration reduce employment opportunities by limiting the number of available jobs and increasing the amount of competition for those jobs.
In turn, both factors can have a positive impact on wages by increasing the relative value of investing in schooling, since higher education leads to more job opportunities and greater earnings.
The third factor — higher returns to schooling — causes teenagers to pursue school over employment (either attending school when they otherwise would have worked full time, or attending school exclusively when they otherwise would have worked while attending school).
While the authors found that all three factors — higher minimum wages, increased immigration, and greater returns to schooling — contributed to the decline in teenage employment between 1994 and 2014, higher minimum wages had the largest impact.
The minimum wage impact was particularly predominant for teens ages 16 to 17 since 2000.
If higher minimum wages and the resulting shift in more teens attending school exclusively — as opposed to working full-time or working while in school — led to greater human capital, then minimum wages would still have a positive impact on earnings.
However, when looking at the longer-term effects of minimum wages, immigration, and returns to schooling on human capital and earnings, the authors found:
… no evidence that higher minimum wages … led to greater human capital investment. If anything, the evidence is in the other direction. Thus, it is more likely that the principal effect of higher minimum wages in the 2000s, in terms of human capital, was to reduce employment opportunities that could enhance labor market experience.
So, while some workers benefited from higher minimum wages in the short term, the authors found that higher minimum wages had either no impact or a negative impact on the long-run earnings of workers exposed to higher minimum wages as teenagers.
This is an important finding for policymakers to take into account when considering changes in minimum wage laws.
The value of employment goes beyond the immediate wages it provides. Employment provides valuable human capital development that cannot necessarily be replaced by formal education.
Since 2014, 21 states have changed their minimum wage laws. Twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia have higher minimum wages than the federal minimum wage ($7.25 per hour) and 41 localities have a higher minimum wage than their states, with some minimum wages topping $15 per hour.
With declining employment and labor force participation weighing down individual incomes and overall economic growth (and contributing to unsustainable budget deficits), policymakers should be looking for ways to reduce excessively high minimum wages, as opposed to raising them.
Rachel Greszler is a senior policy analyst in economics and entitlements at The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis.
A version of this Op-Ed appeared on The Daily Signal website under the headline “New Study Shows Minimum Wage Puts a Damper on Long-Run Earnings.”
The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.