Path 27
Commentary

1 School District Knew Exactly How To Handle Student Walkouts... Media Freakout Coming

Path 27

Thousands of students across the country participated Wednesday in what was billed as the National School Walkout, ditching class to go outside and march — ostensibly in honor of the 17 students and faculty who died during the Feb. 14 mass shooting at a Parkland, Florida high school.

The problem is that those marches — many of which were sanctioned by the schools and their administrations — turned out to be less about honoring victims and more about protesting the National Rifle Association, President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans as part of a push for stricter gun control laws.

However, The Hill reported on at least one school district in New Jersey which explicitly prohibited their students from taking part in the politicized event, and even announced disciplinary consequences for any students who defied the school’s directive and choose to participate anyway.

The Sayreville Public School District informed students ahead of time that anybody who exited the school without permission would receive a two-day suspension, while any students who left class and remained on campus to gather in the auditorium would receive detention.

According to MyCentralJersey, little more than a dozen students defied the district and risked suspension as they walked out of the school at around 10 a.m., then gathered together for 17 minutes in honor of the 17 victims.

Trending:
Cuomo Sacrifices Political Elites in Attempt to Save Face: Memo Implies 'Look, I'm Not the Only One'

Several dozen others somewhat acquiesced to the district’s orders and remained on campus to gather together in the auditorium, though they will still face detention for ditching class without an acceptable excuse.

One student, 16-year-old freshman Sierra Thomas, spoke about how she and roughly a dozen others exited the school and attempted to gather on the football field, only to find the gates to the stadium locked. As a result, they breifly milled about the parking lot until the principal herded them back into the school and directed them to sign in at the front desk.

Thomas’ older sister, Stephanie Peters, claimed to have reviewed the school’s code of conduct and determined the students who walked out in defiance of the district were guilty of insubordination, an infraction which merits two days of detention, as well as skipping class, which is punished by Saturday detention.

“So obviously they’re going above and beyond what the actual code of conduct is,” stated Peters, who told her younger sister that she had a right to protest under the First Amendment and that teachers should have used the opportunity as a “teaching moment.”

Do you think this school district is right to punish students who disobeyed a directive to not participate in the walkout?

“I think it’s important that the story is told and that the light is shone on Sayreville and what they are doing,” Peters said, “and that they’re silencing students.”

But Peters seemed to be ignoring the fact that the First Amendment doesn’t grant students the right to skip school and engage in political protests, their voices weren’t “silenced,” and the “teaching moment” did indeed occur by way of the disciplinary actions for disobedience — a lesson these students obviously didn’t want to receive or understand.

The president of the Sayreville Board of Education, Kevin Ciak, declined to comment specifically on the punishments for students, but stated, “Some participated within the building, some left the building but remained on school property and a handful — two or three — actually left school property. We’ll be following our student code of conduct for those categories.”

He noted that since students were informed ahead of time by the principal that they were prohibited from walking out of the building, doing so constituted a failure to follow administrative direction, which merited a suspension.

Ciak added that risk to the students and safety concerns were what prompted the prohibition on participation in the walkout.

Related:
Conservatives Fighting Back in the Culture War: The Daily Wire Announces New Film 'Run Hide Fight'

“It’s a highly publicized event,” he said. “It’s a highly publicized date and time and anyone who wants to inflict harm knows across the country when these students will be walking out. From a students’ protection standpoint, that’s also why we are taking the action we are and following our student code of conduct.”

Of course, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union denounced the district’s punishments as “heavy-handed,” “misguided” and “punitive” — and there is little doubt that other organizations which supported the march, as well as certain liberal media outlets, will be piling on this school district for having the audacity to do the right thing and demand their students remain in class instead of participating in a highly publicized and politicized, yet unsanctioned event.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



loading

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , ,
Path 27
Ben Marquis is a writer who identifies as a constitutional conservative/libertarian. He has written about current events and politics for The Western Journal since 2014. His focus is on protecting the First and Second Amendments.
Ben Marquis has written on current events and politics for The Western Journal since 2014. He reads voraciously and writes about the news of the day from a conservative-libertarian perspective. He is an advocate for a more constitutional government and a staunch defender of the Second Amendment, which protects the rest of our natural rights. He lives in Little Rock, Arkansas, with the love of his life as well as four dogs and four cats.
Birthplace
Louisiana
Nationality
American
Education
The School of Life
Location
Little Rock, Arkansas
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics




loading

Conversation