Sports

Kamala Harris Tries To Argue for Equal Pay for Women's Soccer Team, Accidentally Does the Opposite

Combined Shape

One of the leading 2020 Democratic presidential candidates tried to make a case for the U.S. women’s soccer team being paid the same as the men’s team — but she inadvertently undercut her own argument.

Sen. Kamala Harris of California has been politicizing the World Cup since it started.

Over the weekend, she continued this trend — and took a shot at the men’s team.

Trending:
CNN Fact Check Shows Biden Made Up Fake People to Support Jobs Plan

“The USWNT scored more goals in their first World Cup match against Thailand than the U.S. men’s team scored in the 2010 and 2014 World Cups combined,” Harris tweeted Saturday. “We’re beyond past time to pay these championship athletes what they deserve.”

If Harris wants to argue that the women’s team should be paid more money, that’s fine. She has that right.

Do you think the U.S. women should be paid the same as the men?

However, to suggest they deserve more based on their skill level relative to the men is a terrible argument.

The reason the U.S. women have scored more goals than the men is that the competition is significantly worse.

In the first round of the World Cup this year, the U.S. women beat Thailand 13-0. The fact that they scored 13 goals and dominated Thailand doesn’t mean they’re more skilled than the U.S. men; it just shows the lack of competitiveness in the women’s game.

No team has ever won by a 10-goal margin in a men’s World Cup, where the competition is much more intense and there’s a lot more parity between teams.

There is a serious gap in skill level between the U.S. men’s and women’s teams, so it makes zero sense to try to compare them on the basis of skill.

Related:
Despite Equality Obsession, Dems Launch New Segregation Tactic with 'Vaccinated Only' Section

After all, the U.S. women’s team lost 5-2 to the under-15 FC Dallas boys club in 2017.

The U.S. men’s team has never played the women’s team. However, the fact that Megan Rapinoe and company lost to a team of young teenagers should give one an indication of how that game would go.

From a financial standpoint, there is also no comparison between the men’s and women’s teams.

The men attract a lot more eyeballs and gain much more revenue than the women.

The 2018 men’s World Cup attracted 3.6 billion viewers worldwide compared to the 764 million the women had in 2015, according to FIFA’s website.

Financially, the 2010 men’s World Cup generated about $4 billion in revenue. This was far greater than the approximately $73 million the women’s tournament earned in 2011, according to CBS.

The women make $3,600 per game, while the men make $5,000, according to Vox. The women got $15,000 bonuses for winning the 2014 World Cup, while the men got $55,000 apiece for making it to the Round of 16 in 2015.

In March, 28 players from the women’s team filed a discrimination lawsuit against U.S. Soccer. Their argument is that the disparity in pay between them in the men violates the Equal Pay Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

If Harris wants to help the women out, perhaps she should stop arguing for their pay raise on the basis of skill — because she is only hurting their case by doing it.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →






We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , ,
Tom is a freelance writer from Massachusetts' South Shore. He covers sports, culture and politics and has written for The Washington Examiner, LifeZette and other outlets.
Tom is a freelance writer from Massachusetts' South Shore. He covers sports, culture and politics and has written for The Washington Examiner, LifeZette and other outlets.
Location
Massachusetts
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Sports, culture, politics




Conversation