Canada allows extradition case against Huawei CFO to proceed
TORONTO (AP) — Canada said it will allow a U.S. extradition request for an executive of Chinese tech giant Huawei to face charges over possible dealings with Iran to proceed.
The Department of Justice said Friday officials made the decision after a diligent review of the case against Meng Wangzhou, chief financial officer of Huawei Technologies Ltd., the biggest global maker of network equipment for phone and internet companies. A department statement stressed that Canada was following its laws.
Meng’s Dec. 1 arrest at the Vancouver airport set off a diplomatic furor and strained Canadian relations with China. Beijing has accused Washington of a politically motivated attempt to hurt a potential competitor to U.S. technology vendors.
Meng, the daughter of Huawei’s founder, is accused of lying to banks about the company’s dealings with Iran in violation of U.S. trade sanctions. She is free on bail in Vancouver and is due in court Wednesday, when a date for an extradition hearing will be set. The decision to proceed is a formality and allows a judge to hear arguments on whether to grant the U.S. request.
A decision to extradite ultimately must be approved by Canada’s justice minister.
“There is sufficient evidence to be put before an extradition judge for decision,” the statement said.
The Chinese government on Saturday criticized the decision as a “serious violation” of Meng’s rights and called on Washington to withdraw its extradition request.
“The U.S. and Canada have abused their bilateral extradition agreement,” said a Foreign Ministry statement.
China detained former Canadian diplomat Michael Kovrig and Canadian entrepreneur Michael Spavor on Dec. 10 in an apparent attempt to pressure Canada to release Meng.
A Chinese court also sentenced a Canadian to death in a sudden retrial, overturning a 15-year prison term handed down earlier. Kovrig and Spavor haven’t had access to a lawyer since being arrested.
Meng is living in one of two Vancouver mansions she owns.
“We are disappointed that the Minister of Justice has decided to issue an Authority to Proceed in the face of the political nature of the U.S. charges and where the President of the United States has repeatedly stated that he would interfere in Ms. Meng’s case if he thought it would assist the U.S negotiations with China over a trade deal,” said her lawyer, David Martin, in a statement.
Martin said the charges against Meng are not crimes in Canada and that his client maintains her innocence.
The Chinese Embassy in Ottawa criticized the case in a statement as “a political persecution against a Chinese high-tech enterprise.”
Huawei is a focus of U.S. security concerns.
Washington has pressured other countries to limit use of its technology, warning they could be opening themselves up to surveillance and theft of information.
The U.S. and China have tried to keep Meng’s case separate from their wider trade dispute, but President Donald Trump has undercut that. Trump said he would consider intervening in the case against Meng if it would be in the interest of U.S. national security or help forge a trade deal with Beijing.
The Chinese embassy statement that due to “obvious political interference,” Canada should refuse the U.S. extradition request and release Meng.
U.S. Justice Department spokeswoman Nicole Navas Oxman said the department pursues cases “free of any political interference” and follows evidence and the law.
Guy Saint-Jacques, a former Canadian ambassador to China, said Chinese authorities are not interested in hearing about how Canada is bound by its extradition case with the U.S.
Saint-Jacques said China might apply further pressure on Canada.
The Western Journal has not reviewed this Associated Press story prior to publication. Therefore, it may contain editorial bias or may in some other way not meet our normal editorial standards. It is provided to our readers as a service from The Western Journal.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
