Share
News

BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules 6-3 That Drawing Congressional Districts Based on Race is Unconstitutional

Share

The Supreme Court issued a major redistricting ruling on Wednesday morning.

In a 6-3 decision, the court struck down Louisiana’s new congressional map.

The majority found the map amounted to what it called unconstitutional “racial gerrymandering.”

The majority opinion was written by Associate Justice Samuel Alito.

Alito wrote, “Another problem stemmed from the long-unresolved question whether compliance with the Voting Rights Act provides a compelling reason that may justify the intentional use of race in drawing legislative districts.”

The ruling was widely celebrated by conservatives:

Related:
CIA Accused of Raiding Tulsi Gabbard's Office Seizing JFK, MKUltra Documents Set for Declassification

Justice Clarence Thomas separately stated, “Today’s decision should largely put an end to this ‘disastrous misadventure’ in voting-rights jurisprudence.”

The ruling comes a week after Virginia Democrats successfully passed an initiative to disenfranchise 45 percent of voters with a 10-1 congressional map that favored their party.

Choose The Western Journal as your preferred source on Google and never miss reporting that defends truth, protects freedom, and advances Western civilization

Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.

Submit a Correction →



Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Share
Tags:
, , , ,

Conversation