California Primary Highlights Drawbacks in Mail-In Voting After State Rejects 100K Ballots
More than 100,000 mail-in ballots were rejected by California election officials during the March presidential primary, according to data obtained by The Associated Press.
California is one of a number of states increasing mail-in balloting, ostensibly to avoid crowds at polling places amid the coronavirus pandemic.
President Donald Trump is among those questioning the integrity of vote-by-mail elections, while supporters claim they are just as reliable as polling places.
Of course, polling places have workers who can try to ensure each vote is cast by the right person and who can assist those who have questions about filling out ballots.
A voter doesn’t have support at home, and so problems can arise.
The California secretary of state’s election data obtained by the AP showed 102,428 mail-in ballots were disqualified in the state’s 58 counties, about 1.5 percent of the nearly 7 million mail-in ballots returned. That percentage is the highest in a primary since 2014, and the overall number is the highest in a statewide election since 2010.
Two years ago, the national average of rejected mail ballots in the general election was about 1.4 percent, and in the 2016 presidential election year it was 1 percent, according to a U.S. Election Assistance Commission study.
The most common problem, by far, in California was missing the deadline for the ballot to be mailed and arrive. To count in the election, ballots must be postmarked on or before Election Day and received within three days afterward. Statewide, 70,330 ballots missed those marks.
Another 27,525 either didn’t have a signature or had a signature that didn’t match the one on record for the voter.
Kim Alexander, president of the nonprofit California Voter Foundation, called the uncounted figure discouraging.
“The only thing worse than people not voting is people attempting to vote and having their ballot uncounted,” she said.
The tally of nullified votes “can make a difference in a close contest,” Alexander said.
The data didn’t break down the uncounted ballots by party registration.
While the overall number was large in March, if it’s the same in November it’s unlikely to affect the presidential race — Trump lost the solidly blue state to Democrat Hillary Clinton in 2016 by 4.3 million votes.
But there are expected to be at least several tightly contested U.S. House races where a relatively few votes could tip the balance. In 2018, Democrat T.J. Cox upset Republican David Valadao by fewer than 1,000 votes in a Central Valley district. They have a rematch in November.
Local races sometimes are decided by a handful of votes.
California traditionally has offered mail-in voting only to those who request ballots. Over time the number has grown to represent more than half of all cast ballots.
Purportedly in response to the coronavirus outbreak, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom in June signed a law requiring county election officials to mail a ballot to all the state’s nearly 21 million registered voters for the November election.
In preparation for November, the state is launching a ballot-tracking tool that will quickly alert voters if they need to take action, such as adding a missing signature. Another change: The state is extending the window for mail ballots to arrive to 17 days after Election Day.
Trump has called mail-in voting “a terrible thing” prone to abuse, warning that “you get thousands and thousands of people sitting in somebody’s living room, signing ballots all over the place.”
Just last month, four men were indicted in Paterson, New Jersey, on vote-tampering charges involving mail-in ballots in a municipal election.
Attorney General Gurbir Grewal announced the charges against 1st Ward Councilman Michael Jackson, 3rd Ward Councilman-Elect Alex Mendez, Shelim Khalique and Abu Razyen on June 25 after the four allegedly committed fraud in the May 12 special election.
With the COVID-19 pandemic prompting many state officials to pursue near-universal mail-in voting, Republicans and Democrats have disagreed about the safety and security of votes traveling through the U.S. Postal Service.
Alex Padilla, California’s Democratic secretary of state, claims there is “no safer … way to exercise your right to vote than from the safety and convenience of your own home.”
Research by Alexander’s group has found that an average of nearly two of every 100 mail-in ballots were voided in statewide elections between 2010 and 2018. However, over that time, the rate of disqualification has improved, dropping from over 140,000 ballots, or 2.9 percent in the 2010 general election, to 84,825 ballots, or 1 percent, in 2018.
Last March, the highest rejection rate in California was in San Francisco, where 9,407 ballots, or nearly 5 percent of the total, were set aside, mostly because they did not arrive on time.
By contrast, in rural Plumas County northeast of Sacramento, all of the 8,207 mail-in ballots received were accepted.
In Los Angeles County, nearly 2,800 ballots were nullified because the voter forgot to sign it and then couldn’t be found to fix the error.
Statewide, that mistake spiked nearly 13,000 ballots.
More than 1,000 ballots were disqualified in Fresno County because the signature didn’t match the one on file with election officials. The same problem nixed over 1,300 ballots in San Diego County — and over 14,000 statewide.
In some of those cases, voting experts say, a family member might have signed for others in the household, which is illegal.
In more than 800 instances, envelopes were returned to election officials without the marked ballot inside.
Orange County Registrar of Voters Neal Kelley said ultimately a voter has the responsibility to fill out the ballot correctly and get it in the mail on time.
Sometimes, “it’s just a product of voters forgetting,” Kelley said.
The Western Journal has reviewed this Associated Press story and may have altered it prior to publication to ensure that it meets our editorial standards.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
