Path 27

Dershowitz: 'Kavanaugh is 100% Correct,' President Should Not Be Criminally Prosecuted

Path 27

Renowned legal scholar Alan Dershowitz agreed with President Donald Trump Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh that sitting presidents should not be criminally prosecuted or investigated, and that impeachment is the proper remedy to wrongdoing by the chief executive.

Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, are promulgating an argument that President Trump chose Kavanaugh to shield himself from special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation.

The senators point to 2009 Minnesota Law Review article in which Kavanaugh advocated for Congress to pass legislation that allows presidents to postpone civil lawsuits and facing criminal prosecution until after they leave or are removed from office.

“I believe it vital that the President be able to focus on his never-ending tasks with as few distractions as possible,” the judge wrote.

“Criminal investigations targeted at or revolving around a President are inevitably politicized by both their supporters and critics,” Kavanaugh explained.

Trending:
Wisconsin Election Official Says Zuckerberg-Funded Group Seized Control of 2020 Election

He noted that the Constitution provides the proper remedy for a president believed to be guilty of wrongdoing: impeachment.

“If the President does something dastardly, the impeachment process is available,” he wrote. “In short, the Constitution establishes a clear mechanism to deter executive malfeasance; we should not burden a sitting President with civil suits, criminal investigations, or criminal prosecutions.”

Dershowitz agreed.

“Kavanaugh is 100 percent correct,” the Harvard law professor emeritus told Fox News host Bill Hemmer on Wednesday.

Do you agree with Dershowitz about presidents being exempt from prosecution?

“Not only is he right about the president. He’s right about the Senate and the House,” Dershowitz continued. “They can’t be investigated for what they’ve done on the floor. It is right about judges and prosecutors.”

“All of them are immune from investigation. They’re immune from prosecution for performing their constitutionally authorized acts,” he said.

Dershowitz has stated in the past that Mueller cannot find Trump obstructed justice by firing former FBI Director James Comey, when, as president, he had the constitutional authority to do so.

Hemmer responded to the professor on Wednesday saying, “It just appears that any time (Democrats) get the opportunity to bring Russia up again, that is where they go.”

Dershowitz — who authored the newly released book “The Case Against Impeaching Trump” — contended that Kavanaugh actually espoused a lesser standard for impeachment of “dastardly” act, than the Constitution states, which is criminal conduct.

Related:
Josh Hammer: For Wishy-Washy Justices, the Moment of Truth Is Here as Abortion Returns to SCOTUS

“You must commit a crime,” said the legal scholar.

Dershowitz told MSNBC’s Chris Matthews on Tuesday that even if Mueller could prove Trump colluded with Russia during the 2016 campaign, collusion is not a crime.

Fox News personality Mark Levin — who served chief in staff for Attorney General Edwin Meese during the Reagan administration — has repeatedly argued Trump cannot be criminally prosecuted while in office.

In May, Levin cited the Department of Justice legal opinion memos drafted during the Nixon and Clinton administrations concluding impeachment is the remedy prescribed by the Constitution.

“Grand juries and prosecutors cannot supplant Congress,” he said. “The only way to remove a sitting president is through the impeachment process, not through the indictment process.”

Submit your story here, and subscribe to our best uplifting stories here.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



loading

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , ,
Path 27
Randy DeSoto has written more than 1,000 articles for The Western Journal since he joined the company in 2015. He is a graduate of West Point and Regent University School of Law. He is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths" and screenwriter of the political documentary "I Want Your Money."
Randy DeSoto is the senior staff writer for The Western Journal. He wrote and was the assistant producer of the documentary film "I Want Your Money" about the perils of Big Government, comparing the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. Randy is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths," which addresses how leaders have appealed to beliefs found in the Declaration of Independence at defining moments in our nation's history. He has been published in several political sites and newspapers.

Randy graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point with a BS in political science and Regent University School of Law with a juris doctorate.
Birthplace
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Nationality
American
Honors/Awards
Graduated dean's list from West Point
Education
United States Military Academy at West Point, Regent University School of Law
Books Written
We Hold These Truths
Professional Memberships
Virginia and Pennsylvania state bars
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Entertainment, Faith




loading

Conversation