Mike Huckabee: Man Convicted of 'Seditious Conspiracy' for J6 Wasn't Even in DC - Now Look at the Jury
I’ve been clear from the outset that the events of Jan. 6 should make no one proud. But a subsequent trial and verdict sure won’t make you proud of our “justice” system, either.
After a nearly four-month trial, four of five Proud Boys were found guilty of seditious conspiracy related to Jan. 6 in a Washington, D.C., court on Thursday.
For more detail, we went to the definitive source on this story, Julie Kelly at American Greatness.
Enrique Tarrio, Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs and Zachary Rehl were all convicted of seditious conspiracy and conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding. Dominic Pezzola was found guilty of conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, and they were all convicted of conspiracy to prevent an officer from discharging any duties, obstruction of law enforcement during a civil disorder, and one count of destruction of government property. For taking an officer’s riot shield during the chaos, Pezzola was also found guilty of assaulting or impeding law enforcement and also of robbery.
Some charges are still unresolved, and Kelly says it’s “unclear” how Judge Tim Kelly (no relation) will instruct the jury on handling those.
We’ve covered this mess of a trial on and off as it started and stopped, especially the last-minute revelation of numerous FBI informants within the group. Kelly’s report has links to the various controversies that came up.
“Seditious conspiracy” is a statute that originated after the Civil War to deal with those who rebelled against the United States. Until 2022, no one had ever been convicted of it. But the language is vague enough to facilitate the criminal prosecution of public dissent. Both seditious conspiracy and obstruction of an official proceeding are felonies punishable by up to 20 years in prison — each.
These individuals were essentially found guilty by reason of inflammatory group chats. They brought no arms to the event, they assaulted no officers, and group leader Tarrio wasn’t even in Washington on Jan. 6. He was in a Baltimore hotel.
Though Judge Kelly is a Trump appointee, Julie Kelly had the impression that he was “acting as a second lawyer for the prosecution, routinely rubber-stamping government motions that make the convictions ripe for appeal.” And there had better be one.
One important reason for an appeal is the makeup of this jury. Of course, in D.C. it’s virtually impossible to get an impartial group of 12, but this particular jury appears to have been dripping with bias.
According to Lawfare writer Roger Parloff, “Six jurors had participated in liberal-leaning protests or marches, while none mentioned conservative-leaning demonstrations. The protests included, in two cases, ‘women’s’ marches; in two cases, ‘anti-gun’ marches; and, in four cases, protests related to Black Lives Matter or George Floyd’s murder. … One sitting juror had a Black Lives Matter sign in her yard.”
As if that weren’t bad enough, at the time of jury selection, the J6 kangaroo kourt was holding its televised hearings, even singling out the Proud Boys, but Judge Kelly was not persuaded that the hearings would influence an already partisan jury pool.
Julie Kelly notes that prosecutors often mentioned Trump during the trial and believes that “the convictions will bolster Special Counsel Jack Smith’s ongoing investigation into Donald Trump for similar charges.” (He’s also in charge of looking into Trump’s alleged possession of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.)
If you doubt that this is the endgame, here’s what attorney Andrew Weissmann (who ran the Mueller investigation of Trump) tweeted after the verdict: “Huge win for the government and our democracy — terrorist group, unleashed by the former President, held to account. Makes [charging] the leader of the seditious conspiracy, one Donald J. Trump, imperative.”
This is surely the ace up their sleeve if Trump maintains his level of support heading into the ‘24 election. They don’t seem to understand that their misuse of the legal system to target Trump is backfiring — convincing many conservatives that we need him in office to take them down.
The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.