Rice Counters Harris' Narrative that Kavanaugh Cannot Be Trusted To Treat All Americans Equally

Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice rebutted California Democratic Sen. Kamala Harris’ argument that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh cannot be trusted to equally apply the law due to his conservative political views.

Rice contended the opposite is true, saying his fidelity to the Constitution is the reason he can be entrusted to serve impartially on the nation’s highest court.

During her opening statement Tuesday at the Kavanaugh Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol Hill, Harris recounted her experience being bussed to a different elementary school due to the precedent set in the Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education ruling years before.

She argued that had the Supreme Court not made that decision in the mid-1950s, it is unlikely she would have been given the educational opportunities she had that ultimately enabled her to become a senator.

Harris went on to voice her concern that due to Kavanaugh’s conservative political views, he would not be an impartial jurist on the Supreme Court. The implication seemed to be the oft-repeated Democrat claim that conservative beliefs are grounded in racism or bigotry.

Trending:
Trump's Advice to Biden for Putin Meeting: 'Good Luck,' 'Don't Fall Asleep'

“Justice wears a blindfold because we have said in the United States of America, under our judicial system, justice should be blind to a person’s status,” she said. “Justice should be blind to how much money someone has, to what you look like or who you love, to who your parents are and the language they speak.”

Harris then accused Kavanaugh of being a partisan.

“Should those cases come before you, Judge Kavanaugh, I am concerned whether you would treat every American equally, or instead show allegiance to the political party, and the conservative agenda that has shaped and built your career,” the Californian stated.

“I am concerned your loyalty would be to the president who appointed you and not to the Constitution of the United States,” Harris added. “I believe the American people have a right to have these concerns.”

Harris was the last of the Democratic senators to give their opening statement, and soon thereafter Rice was the first to speak on behalf of Kavanaugh, formally introducing him to the committee. She noted that the two served together in the George W. Bush administration and are also friends.

Rice vouched for Kavanaugh’s fundamental fairness, pointing out her assessment of what that means is based on her journey from a child in segregated Birmingham, Alabama, to the nation’s first female African American secretary of state.

She directly addressed the issue Harris raised regarding whether the nominee would treat all Americans equally.

“As a little girl born in segregated Birmingham, Alabama, who grew up to be secretary of state, I know personally our country’s long journey to guarantee equal rights,” Rice stated. “I know the power of the Constitution, and I know the gift of our democracy.”

“The Supreme Court is a crucial guardian both of our Constitution and of our democracy,” she continued. “That is why I am so honored to introduce Brett Kavanaugh for these hearings.”

Related:
George W. Bush Finally Revealed Who He Voted for in 2020 and It's Not Who Anyone Expected

“He will be an outstanding Supreme Court justice,” Rice proclaimed. “His intellect is unquestioned. His judgement is highly regarded, and I can personally attest to his character and integrity as a colleague. Brett Kavanaugh will thoroughly and faithfully uphold the trust that is our heritage, the Constitution of the United States of America.”

Do you think Rice effectively countered Harris’ argument?

Kavanaugh and his wife, Ashley — also a George W. Bush White House alum — appeared to be moved to tears by Rice’s words of support after a day marked by protesters interrupting the hearing and politically charged rhetoric by Democratic senators like Harris directed toward the nominee.

Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing will likely last the rest of the week, with a final vote of the full Senate expected by the end of the month.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Randy DeSoto has written more than 1,000 articles for The Western Journal since he joined the company in 2015. He is a graduate of West Point and Regent University School of Law. He is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths" and screenwriter of the political documentary "I Want Your Money."
Randy DeSoto is the senior staff writer for The Western Journal. He wrote and was the assistant producer of the documentary film "I Want Your Money" about the perils of Big Government, comparing the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. Randy is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths," which addresses how leaders have appealed to beliefs found in the Declaration of Independence at defining moments in our nation's history. He has been published in several political sites and newspapers.

Randy graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point with a BS in political science and Regent University School of Law with a juris doctorate.
Birthplace
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Nationality
American
Honors/Awards
Graduated dean's list from West Point
Education
United States Military Academy at West Point, Regent University School of Law
Books Written
We Hold These Truths
Professional Memberships
Virginia and Pennsylvania state bars
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Entertainment, Faith




Conversation