As Taliban Shows Off New US Equipment, Biden Admin Scrubs Records of $83 Billion Given to Afghanistan


Over the past few weeks, the Taliban has upgraded from your standard-issue insurgent Toyota pickup trucks to military-grade Humvees. And armored personnel carriers. And Black Hawk helicopters.

How long they can keep these all going without trained maintenance and parts support is anyone’s guess — but the point is that they have them and that the American taxpayer covered the cost.

Not that President Joe Biden wants you to know this. As the Taliban paraded the captured equipment through the streets of Kandahar on Wednesday, the Biden administration was busy scrubbing public records of how much we paid for it.

According to Forbes, federal agencies are wiping information about the $83 billion the U.S. invested in Afghanistan’s armed forces from their websites, ostensibly to protect our Afghan allies from retribution by the Taliban.

“The safety of our Afghan contacts is of utmost importance to us,” a State Department spokesperson said.

Trump Hit 'So Hard' That His 'Shoes Fell Off' as Secret Service Rushed to Save Him - 'I'm Supposed to Be Dead'

“The State Department advised other federal agencies … to review their web properties for content that highlights cooperation/participation between an Afghan citizen and the USG or a USG partner and remove from public view if it poses a security risk.”

Numbers from a 2017 Government Accountability Office report revealed that between 2003 and 2016, 208 aircraft and almost 76,000 vehicles were supplied to the Afghan military. Oh, and another 600,000 weapons.

In recent days, documents have been disappearing from the website of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, a government watchdog.

“Some SIGAR reports have been temporarily removed from the agency’s public website due to ongoing security concerns in accordance with guidance received from the U.S. Department of State,” a SIGAR spokesperson told Forbes.

“This is in line with actions taken by other U.S. federal agencies and is out of an abundance of caution.”

Is President Biden responsible for the fall of Afghanistan?

This “abundance of caution” is sure felicitous for an administration that doesn’t want lasting reminders of how much military equipment was left behind for terrorists when we scooted out of Afghanistan.

As Forbes’ Adam Andrzejewski noted, “the scrubbed audits and reports included detailed accounting of what the U.S. had provided to Afghan forces, down to the number of night vision devices, hand grenades, Black Hawk helicopters, and armored vehicles.”

He also pointed out that “many of the removed audit reports merely quantified military equipment without identifying personnel.”

These included the 2017 GAO audit of the military equipment in Afghanistan and a SIGAR audit which reported $174 million in drones.

Congressman Reveals Epic Power Move Trump Pulled During Negotiations with Taliban Leader: 'The Definition of Strength'

On Wednesday, we got to see some of that equipment during a Taliban victory parade in Kandahar.

This even included a flyover by a Black Hawk helicopter:

According to the New York Post, Afghanistan’s air force had 167 aircraft in operation in June. Of those, 22 planes and 24 helicopters were evacuated to Uzbekistan by Afghan soldiers before Kabul fell. That means 121 aircraft could be in Taliban hands, although that number is likely lower.

As the Daily Mail noted, U.S. Central Command head Gen. Frank McKenzie said 73 of the aircraft at Hamid Karzai International Airport were “demilitarized” — essentially destroyed — before U.S. forces left.

“Those aircraft will never fly again. … They’ll never be able to be operated by anyone,” he said. “Most of them are non-mission capable, to begin with. But certainly, they’ll never be able to be flown again.”

Rest easy, America.

While U.S. military officials have insisted the other equipment they abandoned in Afghanistan — which included a C-RAM rocket defense system, 27 Humvees and 70 blast-proof vehicles — was deactivated before our exit, it’s unclear how much, if any, of the other Afghan military equipment underwent the same treatment.

Forbes’ Andrzejewski noted that protecting our Afghan allies didn’t seem to be the aim of the Biden administration’s website scrubbing.

“This directive doesn’t seem to be designed to protect our Afghan allies — or, if it is, it’s been poorly executed. One U.S. entity that we will not name has failed to remove a report detailing the Afghan forces by rank. That report, one could argue, could be used as a tally sheet for retribution, but it’s still publicly available,” he wrote.

“Here’s another example. One federal report did not include personnel info, but it did include the face of an Afghan pilot sitting in a U.S. Black Hawk helicopter. When we highlighted the report, we flagged the photo to an agency spokesman and chose not to post a link to protect the pilot’s safety. The report has remained online, but since we contacted the spokesman, the photo has been removed.”

Another example of curiously timed removal: Andrzejewski said the 2017 GAO audit was pulled down hours after Forbes and the Sinclair Broadcast Group reported on its contents.

In the very best light, one could say the Biden administration is scrubbing evidence of its failure at the same time it’s scrubbing the identities of our Afghan allies. But it certainly seems to be more about the former than the latter.

Like it or not, however, it doesn’t matter how much the administration tries to burn $83 billion in receipts when the Taliban is parading the equipment that money bought through the streets — and skies — of Kandahar.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

, , , , , , ,
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014. Aside from politics, he enjoys spending time with his wife, literature (especially British comic novels and modern Japanese lit), indie rock, coffee, Formula One and football (of both American and world varieties).
Morristown, New Jersey
Catholic University of America
Languages Spoken
English, Spanish
Topics of Expertise
American Politics, World Politics, Culture