Share
Commentary

UK Companies Showing a Boy with a Toy Gun & Girl with a Doll Can Now Face Fines, Sanctions

Share

Businesses in the United Kingdom had better avoid showing a little boy playing an intense game with a toy gun or showing a young girl pretending to nurture her little doll.

If businesses don’t avoid such appalling and disgusting imagery, they run the risk of getting heavy sanctions for violating a new rule dictated from brilliant minds within the Advertising Standards Authority, the body that administers UK advertising codes.

If you needed another reason to celebrate July Fourth, add this one to your 1776 Gratitude Pinterest board.

The rule is as clear as it is absurd: “[Advertisements] must not include gender stereotypes that are likely to cause harm, or serious or widespread offence.”

Americans know the word is spelled “offense.” Sheesh.

Trending:
'Holiday Nightmare Comes True' When Man Makes Strange Discovery in a Ravine on His Property

Anyway, I’ll move on.

The reason for this new rule, according to ASA, is apparently watching a young man shoot a toy gun or a young girl play with a doll could “contribute to violence against women and girls” by “perpetuating gender stereotypes.”

A goal of the rule would be help “prevent ads featuring groups of only boys or only girls playing with a toy, on the basis that the absence of one gender or another within a group can strongly imply that a toy is unsuitable for that gender.”

ASA gave a list of ad types that might end up being problematic under the new rule. For instance, “An ad that seeks to emphasise the contrast between a boy’s stereotypical personality (e.g. daring) with a girl’s stereotypical personality (e.g. caring) needs to be handled with care,” ASA explained. (There’s that spelling again.)

Do boys and girls naturally enjoy different toys?

“An ad that belittles a man for carrying out stereotypically ‘female’ roles or tasks,” would possibly be sanctionable as would an ad that “depicts a man or a woman failing to achieve a task specifically because of their gender.”

This kind of regulation isn’t bad because it wants to decrease violence against women. That is an excellent goal.

But the problem is, as is always the case with leftist social justice warriors, that they believe killing free speech is the answer.

If a toy gun maker wants to feature only boys in its commercial, then so be it. If a girl’s doll maker wants to dress a bunch of young girls up in pink dresses and hair ribbons and have them playing with dolls, then fine.

These are not damaging stereotypes.

Related:
Conservatives Fighting Back in the Culture War: The Daily Wire Announces New Film 'Run Hide Fight'

These are realities. And not damaging ones.

If you want to give your girl a toy gun, do it. If you want to buy your son a doll that doesn’t make laser noises, help yourself.

The underlying assumption of regulators like ASA is that any type of gender stereotype is negative. And that is simply not true. In a world that wants to tell us God didn’t make “male and female,” an ad that tries to make Nerf warriors out of boys can seem dangerous.

But what is actually more dangerous is to deny what we know is true about children.

They are created in the image of a loving God. And he made them male and female. He made them differently, with different strengths and passions.

Although such a statement seems outrageous to the left, I hope for the sake of our children, we embrace their intended design, not deny it.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , ,
Share
G.S. Hair is the former executive editor of The Western Journal.
G.S. Hair is the former executive editor of The Western Journal and vice president of digital content of Liftable Media.

After graduating law school from the Cecil C. Humphries School of Law, Mr. Hair spent a decade as an attorney practicing at the trial and appellate level in Arkansas and Tennessee. He represented clients in civil litigation, contractual disputes, criminal defense and domestic matters. He spent a significant amount of time representing indigent clients who could not afford private counsel in civil or criminal matters. A desire for justice and fairness was a driving force in Mr. Hair's philosophy of representation. Inspired by Christ’s role as an advocate on our behalf before God, he often represented clients who had no one else to fight on their behalf.

Mr. Hair has been a consultant for Republican political candidates and has crafted grassroots campaign strategies to help mobilize voters in staunchly Democrat regions of the Eastern United States.

In early 2015, he began writing for Conservative Tribune. After the site was acquired by Liftable Media, he shut down his law practice, moved to Arizona and transitioned into the position of site director. He then transitioned to vice president of content. In 2018, after Liftable Media folded all its brands into The Western Journal, he was named executive editor. His mission is to advance conservative principles and be a positive and truthful voice in the media.

He is married and has four children. He resides in Phoenix, Arizona.
Birthplace
South Carolina
Education
Homeschooled (and proud of it); B.A. Mississippi College; J.D. University Of Memphis
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Culture, Faith, Politics




Conversation

Notice: Due to threatened de-monetization, we have temporarily removed commenting while we build a long-term commenting solution that allows you to voice your opinion freely and allows us to continue to publish the news fearlessly and cover topics that you care about. If you would like to personally partner with The Western Journal to help us continue publishing while under relentless assault by Big Tech, please visit our subscription page here. We encourage you to share this article and discuss with your friends.