Share
News

'Better Get a Big Shovel': Fuming Pete Hegseth Drops a Bunker Buster on Mainstream Media's Iran Attack Narrative

Share

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth laid into CNN and The New York Times on Wednesday for their reporting that indicated the U.S. strikes against Iran’s nuclear sites over the weekend were only marginally successful.

CNN reported that the air strikes on three nuclear facilities “likely only set it back by months, according to an early U.S. intelligence assessment that was described by seven people briefed on it.”

“The assessment, which has not been previously reported, was produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon’s intelligence arm. It is based on a battle damage assessment conducted by U.S. Central Command in the aftermath of the U.S. strikes, one of the sources said,” according to CNN.

Further, the outlet said based on its unnamed sources that Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium was not destroyed and its centrifuges are largely intact.

CNN hedged by saying that the analysis is ongoing and “could change as more intelligence becomes available.”

The Times also reported, based on unnamed sources regarding the intelligence assessment, that the B-2 bomber attacks only set Iran’s nuclear weapons program back “a few months.”

“The strikes sealed off the entrances to two of the facilities but did not collapse their underground buildings, the officials said the early findings concluded,” according to the outlet.

Hegseth addressed the reporting during a news conference following a NATO meeting at The Hague in the Netherlands on Wednesday.

“There’s a reason the president calls out fake news for what it is,” Hegseth said after President Donald Trump stepped aside to let him take the question.

Are you glad Trump chose Hegseth for Secretary of Defense?

“The instinct of CNN, the instinct of The New York Times, is to try to find a way to spin it for their own political reasons to try to hurt President Trump or our country,” he continued.

“They don’t care what the troops think. They don’t care what the world thinks. They want to spin it to try to make him look bad, based on a leak,” Hegseth said.

The official went on to argue that leakers have agendas. “Do they share the whole information or just the part that they want to introduce?” he asked.

Related:
New Satellite Imagery Shows Iran Is Up to Something at Fordow

Hegseth noted that the preliminary intelligence assessment was of low confidence.

“Why is there low confidence? Because all of the evidence of what was just bombed by twelve 30,000-pound bombs is buried under a mountain, devastated and obliterated,” he said.

“So if you want to make an assessment of what happened at Fordow, you better get a big shovel and go really deep, because Iran’s nuclear program is obliterated,” Hegseth asserted.

He concluded, “You know who else knows? Iran, and that’s why they came to the table right away. Because their nuclear capabilities have been set back beyond what they thought was possible because of the courage of a commander-in-chief who led our troops despite what the fake news wants to say.”

Trump told reporters that Israel had agents on the ground who determined there was “total obliteration.”

Trump also read Israel’s Atomic Energy Commission’s battle damage assessment to reporters, saying, “The devastating U.S. strike on Fordow destroyed the site’s critical infrastructure and rendered the enrichment facility totally inoperable. We assess that the American strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities has set back Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons for many years to come.”

He further noted that Iran confirmed its sites took major hits. The nation’s foreign ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, said on Wednesday, “Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that’s for sure.”

Additionally, CIA Director John Ratcliffe countered the CNN and Times stories with a Wednesday afternoon statement, saying that based on a body of credible evidence, Iran’s nuclear weapons program was “severely damaged” by the U.S. air strikes.

Ratcliffe said the evidence “includes new intelligence from an historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.”

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , ,
Share
Randy DeSoto has written more than 3,000 articles for The Western Journal since he began with the company in 2015. He is a graduate of West Point and Regent University School of Law. He is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths" and screenwriter of the political documentary "I Want Your Money."
Randy DeSoto wrote and was the assistant producer of the documentary film "I Want Your Money" about the perils of Big Government, comparing the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. Randy is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths," which addresses how leaders have appealed to beliefs found in the Declaration of Independence at defining moments in our nation's history. He has been published in several political sites and newspapers.

Randy graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point with a BS in political science and Regent University School of Law with a juris doctorate.
Birthplace
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Nationality
American
Honors/Awards
Graduated dean's list from West Point
Education
United States Military Academy at West Point, Regent University School of Law
Books Written
We Hold These Truths
Professional Memberships
Virginia and Pennsylvania state bars
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Entertainment, Faith




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.

Conversation