Share
Commentary

Devastating Video Exposes How CNN Covered FISA Abuse Hearings vs. Impeachment

Share

There’s zero chance, based on the evidence we have at the moment, that Donald J. Trump will be removed from the office of the presidency during his Senate impeachment trial. I’m not even being hyperbolic there. You can literally put on your best Dean Wormer voice and state the Democrats’ chances: “Zero. Point. Zero.”

I know, there’s this belief among liberals that Republicans will have a “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” moment and suddenly decide that Donald Trump was some sort of horrible criminal deserving of being kicked out of the White House. I, too, harbor my own “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” fantasy in which Democrats collectively realize a series of show trials that contain nothing more than innuendoes are profoundly harmful to the body politic, but I realize what it is — a fantasy.

Clearly, with the outcome already determined, we could at least focus on something else. I’m not necessarily talking at the exclusion of impeachment talk, mind you, but we could at least cover other goings-on in Washington, such as the hearings on Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuse uncovered in the recent inspector general’s report.

Instead, when the establishment media covered the IG report, it was presented as if it had done nothing but debunk conservative conspiracy theories — theories that, in some cases, didn’t even really exist. The actual problems uncovered with the FISA warrant that authorized surveillance on Trump campaign staffer Carter Page were mostly ignored, even though there were concurrent hearings on the matter going on in the Senate.

At least most of the cable networks covered Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham’s opening statement on the matter before the Senate Judiciary Committee. One of them didn’t. Guess which one it was?

Trending:
Taylor Swift Faces Fury from Fans, Sparks Backlash Over 'All the Racists' Lyrics - 'So Many Things Wrong About This'

Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel posted a time lapse of the coverage to her Twitter account just in case you weren’t able to suss out which one it was. She also posted what that network did during the opening statement of the impeachment hearings:

The entirety of Democratic Rep. Jerrold Nadler’s opening statement before the House Judiciary Committee was covered, por supuesto. And, at least on Fox News and MSNBC, Graham’s opening statement was covered in its entirety.

Do you think CNN is biased against conservatives?

CNN, however, skipped the South Carolina Republican’s statement in favor of a lot of impeachment coverage, because in case you hadn’t tuned in for the last few months, you’d be up to speed. Also, Etsy commercials!

According to the Washington Examiner, CNN also gave an update on the grounded Boeing 737 Max airplane, clearly a time-sensitive subject.

When the network did decide to cover Graham’s remarks, how it did that was illuminating. According to Fox News, CNN aired a clip where Graham talked about Russia meddling in American elections.

“Notable comment there, something the president has differed with,” CNN’s Jim Sciutto said.

The rest of the remarks — which weren’t so kind to the other side — went uncovered.

Related:
'Unbiased' Ex-CNN Reporter Gets Wake-Up Call from Normal Americans When He Can't Imagine Why Anyone Would Miss Trump Years

However, the non-coverage ended up getting plenty of coverage on Twitter:

That’s the official Trump campaign account. Another Trump-linked account noticed the incongruity, as well:

It wasn’t just the RNC or the Trump campaign, either:

I’m not quite sure what message CNN planned to send here. By omitting the opening remarks, it didn’t do anything aside from draw attention to its own programming decisions. Trust me, I know CNN viewers. They weren’t going to be converted by one 45-minute block of testimony from Graham.

Maybe, in some perfect world, CNN partisans would search out Graham’s remarks and then pay closer attention to the full hearing on FISA abuse. Maybe they’d actually see that no, this wasn’t exactly an exoneration of Jim Comey’s FBI.

Or maybe I’ve just watched “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” too many times.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , , , ,
Share
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014. Aside from politics, he enjoys spending time with his wife, literature (especially British comic novels and modern Japanese lit), indie rock, coffee, Formula One and football (of both American and world varieties).
Birthplace
Morristown, New Jersey
Education
Catholic University of America
Languages Spoken
English, Spanish
Topics of Expertise
American Politics, World Politics, Culture




Conversation