Share
Op-Ed

Drollinger: God's Blueprint for Helping the Poor Does Not Involve the Government

Share

Scripture never suggests that civil government is the curing institution for poverty. And, closely related, Scripture does not support the idea of governments taking from the rich to meet the needs of the poor.

That’s right, my friend. The responsibility to provide a societal safety net falls to God’s other ordained institutions.

God’s Word has much to say about all manner of issues, and that includes the matters of government and economics. This week’s Bible study, “The Rich and the Poor,” reveals through the Scriptures God’s blueprint for helping the poor — and, to be sure, the biblical solution lies not in the government-driven redistribution of wealth, i.e., socialism.

As fallen human beings, we have a propensity to feel like we are superior to others, and believing that the wealthy are crooked is a convenient way to fulfill our superiority quotient. Such prejudice against wealthy individuals leads to many politicians believing it is morally right to take their wealth from them and give it to the poor.

In more specific terms, prejudicial conclusions lead to the governmental justification of taxing the rich at higher percentages. Those who have wealth are treated differently than those without. Common statements such as “it’s time for the wealthy to start paying their fair share” illustrate this bias.

Trending:
Arizona's Democratic Governor Vetoes 10 Bills Simultaneously, Including Anti-Squatting and Election Security Measures

But what is actually fair and just is for all citizens to pay the same rate — no matter their lot in life and no matter their income. Lady Justice is supposed to sport a blindfold. A wealthy person should not have to pay a higher percentage in taxes because he makes more money any more than a poor person should have to pay a higher percentage because he makes less.

Think about it: When civil government becomes compassionate it becomes prejudicial. Whereas other God-ordained institutions can manifest compassion, the civil government cannot because it is supposed to equally and justly represent every citizen.

Scripture tells us that those who create wealth should be praised and incentivized to create even greater wealth — perhaps with tax breaks! Such leads to more job creation and employment — and more wealth for individuals, families, churches and businesses to give to the less fortunate.

To excuse the disproportional taxing of a resourceful individual with a dismissive comment like “they can afford it” or “it won’t hurt them” is to cast aside the consideration of justice. These kinds of comments, in fact, display prejudice and partiality.

Should the wealthy be taxed at a higher rate?

Much more often than not, the reason wealthy people are wealthy is that they have been willing to take more risks when they saw an opportunity and/or because they worked harder and had more character and perseverance. Such honorable attributes are worthy of praise — not penalty.

To give a poor man a lower tax rate is for government to show partiality when it is called by God to be impartial. Notice Exodus 23:3 in this regard: “Nor shall you be partial to a poor man in his dispute.” In context, this passage relates to a courtroom matter, but the principle is applicable to economics as well.

Proverbs 17:26 states the same principle as Exodus 23:3, albeit in the opposite way: “It is also not good to fine the righteous, nor to strike the noble for their uprightness.” To unjustly tax a wealthy person is for government to fine the righteous. It is to strike an innocent person for no biblical reason.

Again, civil government needs to be just and impartial to all citizens.

God does have a plan to help the poor, but note what is missing from these passages:

Related:
Drollinger: Understanding the Separation - The Church's Job Is Crucial to the State
  • “But now, I am going to Jerusalem serving the saints. For Macedonia and Achaia have been pleased to make a contribution for the poor among the saints in Jerusalem” (Romans 15:25-26).
  • “They only asked us to remember the poor — the very thing I also was eager to do” (Galatians 2:10).
  • “But whoever has the world’s goods, and sees his brother in need and closes his heart against him, how does the love of God abide in him?” (1 John 3:17)

Of all the passages that instruct individual believers, families and churches to help the bereft, none of them ever mention civil government.

In 1 Timothy 5:3-16, Paul engages in a lengthy discussion of God’s perspective on social safety nets. This powerful and informative passage reveals the following hierarchy, God’s plan for taking care of the bereft: The needs of the poor are to be met first by individual believers, then by heads of households, and then and only then does the responsibility fall to the church.

Nowhere in Scripture does the responsibility default to the state because God did not intend for it to accomplish this task. Socialism has no biblical basis (which is why socialist countries always fail in a matter of time).

When governments begin to hand out money in an attempt to “solve” poverty, they create a permanent dependent class. They must then continue to hand out money as if that solves poverty.

The reason this is not the solution is twofold. First, it leads to the state’s insolvency, as we are witnessing with America’s run­away entitlement programs. Second, it serves to keep the dependent person dependent, as good as guaranteeing that he will remain poor.

The only real solution to poverty is for the out-of-work person to get a job and keep it. Therefore, all permanent solutions to poverty must have nothing less than that objective in mind.

When God placed Adam in the garden, He told him to work it and keep it (Genesis 2:15). Extremely important to note is that this command to work is given before the fall. That is to say, the necessity of work is not a result of the curse; rather, it is a vital aspect of man’s inner sense of value and dignity. God designed man to work!

Civil governments must incorporate this biblical truth into all policy formation pertaining to poverty. Any programs that do not lead to an individual working to provide for himself will only serve to further cripple that individual. Furthermore, entitlement programs, which are not informed by Genesis 2:15, only prolong and create an addiction to poverty.

Be sure of this fact: Entitlements do not provide for the poor what God says are their needs!

Notice what Paul says in this regard in the following passages:

  • “Make it your ambition to lead a quiet life and attend to your own business and work with your hands, just as we commanded you, so that you will behave properly toward outsiders and not be in any need” (1 Thessalonians 4:11-12).
  • “If anyone is not willing to work, then he is not to eat, either” (2 Thessalonians 3:10).

For the government to use its power in a socialistic way is to be biblically naive. Governments must stand aside and allow the stronger citizens to help the weaker ones individually and personally via their families and churches and via the jobs they create with their businesses.

Click here to read the full study.

The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , ,
Share
Ralph Drollinger, president and founder of Capitol Ministries, leads three Bible studies with political leaders every week. One on the Hill for U.S. senators and one for representatives, plus a weekly remote Bible study for state governors, former governors, and former White House Cabinet members and senior staff. Learn more at capmin.org/ministries.

Drollinger played basketball at UCLA under coach John Wooden and was the first player in NCAA history to go to the Final Four four times. Drollinger was taken in the NBA draft three times but chose to forgo the NBA to play with Athletes in Action, an evangelistic basketball team that toured the world and preached the gospel at halftime. Drollinger signed with the Dallas Mavericks in 1980 as a free agent, becoming the first Maverick in the history of the franchise.




Conversation