Share
Op-Ed

Itxu Díaz: Fauci’s False Notion of Total Security

Share

Perhaps if you quarantine yourself in the germ-free sterile environment of a plastic bubble while living in a secluded bunker, you could get very close to what Dr. Fauci and his clones around the world desire for you. That is, you can get closer to total security. But then you would die of boredom.

The world is full of things that prick, cut or bruise — of things that poison, bite or infect. The world is a hostile place, and no one can protect you against all of that, not even the fatherlike Joe Biden.

After a year of the pandemic, everyone’s true colors have been revealed: The left is comfortable with trying to get the government to guarantee total security — a mythical concept, by the way — while the right feels better if the government interferes as little as possible.

The left is sure that a paternal government must protect citizens from everything. The right wing is convinced that there is nothing more dangerous than trusting the government.

In his latest remarks, Fauci has tried to shake off the critics with a smack, ensuring us that the government’s decisions are ordered by science. Well, who is science to give orders? What is science? At what point has science said to stop the Johnson & Johnson vaccine? Are you sure it said that? What kind of science said it? Mathematics? The natural sciences? Criminology? Politics?

Trending:
Arizona's Democratic Governor Vetoes 10 Bills Simultaneously, Including Anti-Squatting and Election Security Measures

First of all, it should be clarified that science does not speak. I don’t know about you, but I have never seen a test tube walk around the laboratory, with its hands behind its back, saying, “Dear friends, we are in a historic moment and, as a test tube, I could not be more excited by addressing you in this beautiful auditorium on such a special day.”

Science offers material for others to ponder, decide and speak. But science cannot command anything, unless you consider the penicillin formula or a fruit’s oxidation process an imperative command.

On the other hand, since the beginning of the pandemic, we have seen the scientific community change its mind every five minutes while governments around the world take shots in the dark, combining excessive restrictive measures with others that are just plain ridiculous.

While Europe emphasizes night curfews — as if we were at war and the coronavirus were in the habit of taking advantage of the silence of the night to make its attack — many other regions consider masks to be little less than an anti-missile shield that one cannot part with — not even when vacationing on the moon.

Do you think it's time to stop listening to Fauci?

This is not science; it’s superstition.

When a group of citizens, fed up with the unreasonable demands of their politicians, decide to go out and protest in order to get explanations, the leaders always respond the same: “We limit ourselves to doing what the scientists say,” which is a way of giving this stupid century its favorite drug. For years we have exalted science to the height of the greatest deity, so it is unlikely that a majority of citizens can now mistrust its word.

It just so happens that science is one thing that bases its success on its many failures, which doesn’t sound flattering when lives are at stake. And, on the other hand, scientists work in parallel universes, out of touch with business, the economy, and real life.

If no one in their right mind would vote for a scientific party, I don’t know, Scientists Without Borders, for example, why in the world are governments leaving all this exclusively in its hands?

But even if a legion of scientists is guiding the government, hardly anyone knows exactly who they are and what drives them. After all, in addition to being scientists, I suppose they are human and, therefore, political subjects. But they might not even be human. I’m not kidding.

Related:
Harsanyi: Fauci Can't Whitewash His Disastrous Legacy

In Spain, after months of bizarre political decisions that the socialist-communist government attributed to a large scientific committee, we discovered that the committee was nonexistent. In other words, there was no such committee. The ruinous and absurd restrictions were taken by President Sánchez after meeting with himself.

So when you hear that such a decision has been made following the orders of science, be suspicious. And after doubting, doubt again. There are those who are recovering their dream of a communist paradise in the West using the coronavirus as an excuse. And we do have a vaccine against that: It’s called freedom and more freedom.

This article first appeared on The Western Journal en Español.

The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , , , , ,
Share
Itxu Díaz is a Spanish journalist, political satirist and author. He has written nine books on topics as diverse as politics, music or smart appliances. He is a contributor to The Daily Beast, The Daily Caller, National Review, The American Conservative, The American Spectator and Diario Las Américas in the United States, and columnist for several Spanish magazines and newspapers. He was also an advisor to the Ministry for Education, Culture and Sports in Spain. Follow him on Twitter at @itxudiaz or visit his website www.itxudiaz.com.




Conversation