Share
Commentary

Here's the Moment Amb. Volker 'Took Apart' Dems' Entire Impeachment Case, According to Rep. Turner

Share

With impeachment hearings for President Donald Trump moving at full speed in their second week, the establishment media is scrambling to re-write and re-re-write the narrative as House Democrats’ case with regard to the Ukraine scandal crumbles.

Despite hours of testimony filled with speculation, grandstanding and hearsay — drawn primarily from second- and third-hand witnesses — left-wing media sources have painted each day as a new nightmare for the Trump administration.

One of many offenders, The Guardian reported Tuesday that Democrats were “edging closer to Trump,” somehow claiming “Republican witness backfires” after the testimony of former U.S. special envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker.

Of course, anyone willing to sign their name to such claims either didn’t watch the testimony or doesn’t live in this reality.

As Ohio Rep. Mike Turner perfectly summarized Tuesday, Volker “took apart” the Democratic Party’s entire legal case against the president in under two minutes of questioning.

Trending:
Video: Horrific Bow-and-Arrow, Knife Attack Leaves 5 Dead, Proves Dem Schemes for Gun Control Don't Work

House Democrats have repeatedly adjusted their allegations against Trump with regard to the Ukraine scandal but, despite playing fast and loose with talking points, the argument remains that the president leveraged U.S. military aid to coerce Ukraine into investigating potential 2020 political opponent Joe Biden.

Thus, Turner argued, so long as the case is based on allegations of such a quid pro quo, “it really only comes down to” two things: Trump’s intentions and statements in retracting the aid and Ukrainian diplomats’ understanding of why said aid was retracted.

Do you think the Democrats have a legitimate case for Trump's impeachment?

Of course, Volker — one of the only witnesses actually present for the July 25 call that supposedly proves the quid pro quo between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky — revealed Tuesday that neither Trump nor Ukraine’s diplomats claim the reinstatement of aid hinged upon an investigation into Biden.

“Did the President of the United States ever say to you that he was not going to allow aid of the United States to go to the Ukraine, unless there were investigations into Burisma, the Bidens or the 2016 elections,” Turner asked.

“No, he did not,” Volker responded.

“Did the Ukrainians ever tell you that they understood that they would not get a meeting with the President of the United States, a phone call with the President of the United States, military aid or foreign aid from the United States, unless they undertook investigations of Burisma, the Bidens or the 2016 elections,” Turner followed up.

“No, they did not,” Volker again responded.

Related:
Anti-Trump Impeachment Witness: Putin Thought Trump Was Stupid, So He Waited for Biden to Invade Ukraine

In response, Turner would say only, “Now, pretty much Ambassador Volker, you just, like, took apart their entire case.”

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , ,
Share
Andrew J. Sciascia was the supervising editor of features at The Western Journal. Having joined up as a regular contributor of opinion in 2018, he went on to cover the Barrett confirmation and 2020 presidential election for the outlet, regularly co-hosting its video podcast, "WJ Live," as well.
Andrew J. Sciascia was the supervising editor of features at The Western Journal and regularly co-hosted the outlet's video podcast, "WJ Live."

Sciascia first joined up with The Western Journal as a regular contributor of opinion in 2018, before graduating with a degree in criminal justice and political science from the University of Massachusetts Lowell, where he served as editor-in-chief of the student newspaper and worked briefly as a political operative with the Massachusetts Republican Party.

He covered the Barrett confirmation and 2020 presidential election for The Western Journal. His work has also appeared in The Daily Caller.




Conversation