Share
Commentary

Slate Misquotes Kavanaugh, Then Attacks Him over Its Lie

Share

A Slate story that attacked Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee and threw into question whether or not he had lied misrepresented a key portion of what Kavanaugh said — something any writer would have realized had they checked the transcript.

The Sunday piece by Molly Olmstead is titled “Kavanaugh, Who Said He Had ‘No Connections’ to Yale, Was a Legacy Student.”

The piece piggy-backed off an article by The Intercept that tried to stretch slight inaccuracies into blatant instances of perjury.

“After hours of testimony Thursday during which Brett Kavanaugh answered — and dodged — questions from the Senate Judiciary Committee, observers noted that the Supreme Court nominee had, on multiple occasions, lied under oath,” Olmstead wrote.

“The lies ranged from outright falsehoods to misleading assertions (he claimed … the matter had been investigated, when in reality alleged witnesses just issued short statements; and he claimed the alleged witnesses said the party didn’t happen, when in reality they said they couldn’t remember it) and dubious statements (he claimed he never had gaps in his memory, while others attested to his heavy drinking).”

Trending:
'Holiday Nightmare Comes True' When Man Makes Strange Discovery in a Ravine on His Property

Note that the “outright falsehoods” category isn’t filled out with parenthetical examples like the others. But I digress. Olmstead’s piece was based on a smaller portion of Kavanaugh’s testimony that dealt with his admission to Yale Law School.

Do you think Slate is fair and honest in its reporting?

“At one point in the testimony, when Kavanaugh was making the point that he had worked hard and earned his success, Kavanaugh told the committee that he had no connections to Yale before attending. ‘I have no connections there,’ he said. ‘I got there by busting my tail,'” Olmstead said.

“In reality, Kavanaugh was a legacy student. His grandfather, Everett Edward Kavanaugh, attended Yale as an undergraduate.”

Not exactly Watergate tapes stuff there, but in addition to being inconsequential, it’s also not what Kavanaugh said.

The judge actually made the statement in regard to his admission to Yale Law School, which none of his relatives had attended.

Olmstead also mischaracterized the context in which it appeared; Kavanaugh was responding to a question by Hawaii Democrat Sen. Mazie Hirono about his drinking by saying his heavy workload was far from that of a frequent alcohol abuser.

“I got into Yale Law School. That’s the No. 1 law school in the country,” Kavanaugh said during his testimony. “I had no connections there. I got there by busting my tail in college. …

“I’ll say, look at my academic record, and I don’t usually like to talk about myself this way, but in response to your – you know, I worked very hard in college, in my studies, and I also played basketball, I did sports, and I also did socialize.”

Related:
Sweden Elects First Female Prime Minister, But 7 Hours Later Everything Falls Apart

The Intercept has since issued a correction for that portion of the story. As of Tuesday morning, Slate hasn’t — mostly because the entire story hinges upon it.

I know we’ve dispensed with a lot of the niceties of journalism in the past decade or two, but you can’t just make up quotes about someone and then run with a story entirely based around one specific quote.

There’s a certain wonderful irony, however, in an entire story based about “small falsehoods” being based around a small falsehood itself.

Then again, if Slate is so obsessive regarding “small falsehoods,” why isn’t it correcting the story?

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , ,
Share
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014. Aside from politics, he enjoys spending time with his wife, literature (especially British comic novels and modern Japanese lit), indie rock, coffee, Formula One and football (of both American and world varieties).
Birthplace
Morristown, New Jersey
Education
Catholic University of America
Languages Spoken
English, Spanish
Topics of Expertise
American Politics, World Politics, Culture




Conversation

Notice: Due to threatened de-monetization, we have temporarily removed commenting while we build a long-term commenting solution that allows you to voice your opinion freely and allows us to continue to publish the news fearlessly and cover topics that you care about. If you would like to personally partner with The Western Journal to help us continue publishing while under relentless assault by Big Tech, please visit our subscription page here. We encourage you to share this article and discuss with your friends.