Path 27
Commentary

Soleimani Was Actively Planning Attack on Americans & Libs Are Angry He's Dead

Path 27

There are liberals who aren’t just questioning the value of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani being dead; they’re actually saying that the United States may have broken American and international law by killing the commander of the Quds Force in an airstrike on Friday.

There’s no universe in which Soleimani could have been considered a reasonable state actor. He was at the head of an elite force that was a wing of a branch of the Iranian military that’s considered a terrorist organization by the United States. In that capacity, he was behind much of the insurgency we saw in Iraq during the war.

He was also behind the militias who carried out the U.S. embassy attack in Baghdad that preceded his death.

Perhaps most importantly, though, intelligence says that he was planning another attack on Americans.

The Department of Defense first claimed this in a statement issued after Soleimani’s death Friday.

Trending:
Trial of Democratic Megadonor Gets Dark as Prosecution Rolls Horrific Video, Judge Warns Traumatized Jury May Need Counseling

“At the direction of the President, the U.S. military has taken decisive defensive action to protect U.S. personnel abroad by killing Qasem Soleimani, the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force, a U.S.-designated Foreign Terrorist Organization,” the statement from Defense Secretary Mark Esper read.

“General Soleimani was actively developing plans to attack American diplomats and service members in Iraq and throughout the region. General Soleimani and his Quds Force were responsible for the deaths of hundreds of American and coalition service members and the wounding of thousands more,” it continued.

“He had orchestrated attacks on coalition bases in Iraq over the last several months — including the attack on December 27th — culminating in the death and wounding of additional American and Iraqi personnel. General Soleimani also approved the attacks on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad that took place this week.”

Do you think the U.S. did the right thing in taking Soleimani out?

There doesn’t seem to be a lot of serious dispute on this point from any front — on whether or not Suleimani was planning to attack U.S. diplomats, service members and other American interests. Everyone kind of concedes this is what Soleimani did, even if the evidence doesn’t seem to definitively prove it yet.

And yet somehow, for Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe, a Trump critic well known for trafficking in conspiracy theories, this apparently wasn’t terribly relevant to the issue:

There were the people who believe that Suleimani, a terrorist by all designations, was part of the state apparatus and therefore shielded by not only international law but by American law prohibiting assassinations:

Related:
Biden to Israeli Pres: 'Not Technically Appropriate, But I'm So Delighted His Daughter Is Here'

Then there was the “Trump doesn’t have a plan” crowd, which included Trump Republican primary “challenger” Joe Walsh.

And then there was Rose McGowan, who was in a category of her own:

I didn’t remember the Iranian flag having emojis on it.

A close second in this strange category was Farnaz Fassihi posting this “personal” video of the sensitive poet in Soleimani shortly after he was killed:

That’s just beautiful, and surely of so much solace to the families of the Americans killed by the IEDs his Shiite militias planted all over Iraq.

She would later double back on those vilifying her for sharing the video, saying that “it’s noteworthy as part of Iran’s efforts to turn Soleimani into a legend/cult figure at home and in the region. Showing him reciting poetry about becoming a martyr is aimed at elevating his standing-martyrdom is revered in Shia Islam.”

This would have been context best shared at the beginning of all of this, no?

Maj. Gen. Soleimani was a terrorist who had taken hundreds — if not thousands — of American lives and would have taken as many more as he could have without endangering his own existence.

On that last part, he apparently misjudged. Nobody should feel too bad about that fact.

The fact that liberals are angry is a sign they either don’t know who he is or they don’t care, so long as Trump’s administration killed him.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



loading

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , , , , ,
Path 27
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014. Aside from politics, he enjoys spending time with his wife, literature (especially British comic novels and modern Japanese lit), indie rock, coffee, Formula One and football (of both American and world varieties).
Birthplace
Morristown, New Jersey
Education
Catholic University of America
Languages Spoken
English, Spanish
Topics of Expertise
American Politics, World Politics, Culture




loading

Conversation