Share
Commentary

Supreme Court Posts an Update That's Guaranteed to Infuriate Leftists

Share

A picture is worth a thousand words. In this case, if they’re coming from liberals, most of them are unprintable.

On April 23, all nine justices of the newly constituted Supreme Court met for the first time in person. The past year has precluded such a meeting — along with the traditional photo of the current court, given that the COVID-19 pandemic was well underway by the time Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died and Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed in her place.

According to ABC News, all nine justices were fully vaccinated, however — and, as they met for a private conference to discuss upcoming cases, they took the customary photograph, sans masks.

Trending:
Hunter Biden May Have Just Ratted Out Joe, Acknowledges Identity of the 'Big Guy' in $5M China Deal

But because it took so long for the justices to meet up in person and take the picture, the website of the Supreme Court kept cockles of liberal hearts warm for a few months since Barrett’s October confirmation, at least.

Here was a screenshot of the site on May 1, per the Internet Archive:

And here we are at present:

Yes, it’s a tragedy to have lost Ginsburg — she died of cancer on Sept. 18 — and one doesn’t wish to do a victory lap. However, one does wonder what “Screaming Trump Inauguration Lady” was doing when and if she checked out the web page before and after the change. I hope she’s all right.

Of course, there’s more to the new picture than just a widening conservative majority on the court, one that doesn’t need a dithering Chief Justice John Roberts to have a good day and read the Constitution as it was written.

On Monday, the Supreme Court — which has three justices appointed by former President Donald Trump — announced it would hear arguments in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a decision that had been expected, yet it still brought home the importance of the photo.

Related:
Watch: Rachel Maddow Melts Down as News Breaks That the Supreme Court Is Taking Up Trump's Immunity Case

The case in question has to do with a 2018 Mississippi law, the Gestational Age Act, which bans abortions after 15 weeks.

This is seen as nothing less than Stone Age “Handmaid’s Tale” heresy to liberals who believe that Roe v. Wade wasn’t so much a Supreme Court decision (poorly decided, may I add) but a birthright written in stone.

Yet, as the language of the Gestational Age Act accurately notes, “The United States is one (1) of only seven (7) nations in the world that permits nontherapeutic or elective abortion-on-demand after the twentieth week of gestation.

Will Amy Coney Barrett be a good Supreme Court justice?

“In fact, fully seventy-five percent (75%) of all nations do not permit abortion after twelve (12) weeks’ gestation, except (in most instances) to save the life and to preserve the physical health of the mother.”

In days past, liberals could hope that Roberts would have one of his squishier days and the bill would be struck down. That’s not as clear now — particularly since Barrett is considered to be a strong pro-life judge. (Or, as a certain senator might say, the dogma lives loudly within her.)

If the court modifies its decisions on Roe v. Wade and its companion case, 1992’s Planned Parenthood v. Casey — which established the utterly arbitrary and vague judicial doctrine that it was unconstitutional to pass any law that imposed an “undue burden” on a woman seeking an abortion — we’ll see nothing short of a frenzy of calls for court-packing. All because elections have consequences.

Don’t worry, though: They were going to do that anyway if Justice Barrett was nominated by Trump and/or confirmed by the Senate:

WARNING: The following tweets contain graphic language that some viewers will find offensive.

 

If they think they were angry then, wait until they realize the new justice in the photo believes in the radical concept that the Constitution means what it says it does — and that she likely isn’t  going anywhere for a long while.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , ,
Share
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014. Aside from politics, he enjoys spending time with his wife, literature (especially British comic novels and modern Japanese lit), indie rock, coffee, Formula One and football (of both American and world varieties).
Birthplace
Morristown, New Jersey
Education
Catholic University of America
Languages Spoken
English, Spanish
Topics of Expertise
American Politics, World Politics, Culture




Conversation