Share
Op-Ed

5 Takeaways from Israel’s Massive Intelligence Operation on Iran

Share

The Israeli government on Monday unloaded a massive intelligence data dump that demonstrated Iran’s efforts to hide its nuclear weapons program.

The revelations come weeks before an anticipated decision by the U.S. to “fix or nix” the Iran nuclear deal.

Reactions to the Israeli intelligence revelations ranged from “ding-dong the deal is dead” to “nothing to see here, move along people.” Neither of these extreme assessments accurately characterizes the likely impact this intelligence data will have on the final U.S. decision.

Here are the five takeaways from the intelligence dump that the Trump administration will no doubt take to heart.

1. Trust but verify.

Trending:
Watch: Pelosi Suffers Extreme 54-Second Cognitive Failure on Live TV

The information is true. It is highly unlikely that Monday’s briefing from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is the first the administration has heard about the Israeli intelligence. U.S. officials have already confirmed the veracity of the documents. That doesn’t happen in a vacuum.

Sure, the White House knows the Israeli government dumped the information at a strategic time so as to add pressure to the White House to dump the deal. That doesn’t make the intelligence any less true.

2. Measure means and intent.

The documents don’t necessarily prove that Iran has violated obligations under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (i.e. the Iran nuclear deal) negotiated by the Obama administration. But the documents do conclusively prove the regime lied when it said it had no interest in building a nuclear weapons program, and they show the Iranians clearly have the technical knowledge to pursue a program in the future.

Do you think Obama's Iran nuclear deal was a mistake?

3. The nuclear deal is not enough.

These revelations will only strengthen the administration’s belief that the Iran nuclear deal is inadequate to derail Iran’s nuclear threat.

Reports that suggest the U.S. is trying to amend the deal are accurate. What the administration wants is agreement from Germany, France and the United Kingdom to add more demands and restrictions to the deal. If those European partners don’t agree, then the U.S. will nix the deal and press on.

4. Put Jack back in the box.

Israel’s intelligence and offensive actions in Syria targeting Iranian assets are a reminder of how dangerous Iran has become since the Iran deal was signed.

Related:
Itxu Díaz: Here's a Crazy Thought on the Arab-Israeli Conflict

Iran has sought to build a strategic land bridge to the Israeli border and equip Hezbollah with precision-guided long-range missiles, which could overwhelm Israeli missile defenses. There is no question the potential for a larger war is real, unless the Iranian regime is put back in its box and deterred from its destabilizing activities.

5. The U.S. must lead.

There is a simple cause and effect at play in the Middle East. When the U.S. backs off, Iran runs wild. When the U.S. steps up, everyone else gets a backbone to join, and Iran backs down.

The Iranian regime is fragmented. Iran’s economy is in free-fall. Its people are protesting in the streets. Other nations in the region want the U.S. to step up.

In private, even Germany, France and the U.K. will admit that President Barack Obama negotiated a weak deal. If the U.S. leads, there is a chance to put things right. If not, things will only get worse.

However the White House acts on the deal, don’t bet there is a serious voice in this administration that doesn’t take these five truths to heart.

James Jay Carafano, a leading expert in national security and foreign policy challenges, is The Heritage Foundation’s vice president for foreign and defense policy studies, E. W. Richardson fellow, and director of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies. 

A version of this Op-Ed previously appeared on The Daily Signal under the headline “5 Takeaways From Israel’s Massive Intelligence Operation on Iran.”

The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , ,
Share

Conversation

The Western Journal is pleased to bring back comments to our articles! Due to threatened de-monetization by Big Tech, we had temporarily removed comments, but we have now implemented a solution to bring back the conversation that Big Tech doesn't want you to have. If you have any problems using the new commenting platform, please contact customer support at commenting-help@insticator.com. Welcome back!