Hundreds of California-based corporations must have directors from racial or sexual minorities on their boards under a first-in-the-nation bill signed Wednesday by Gov. Gavin Newsom.
The diversity legislation is similar to a 2018 measure that required boardrooms to have at least one female director by 2019.
Like that measure, it could face court challenges from conservative groups who view it as a discriminatory quota.
“The new law represents a big step forward for racial equity,” according to Democratic Assemblyman Chris Holden, who co-authored the bill.
“While some corporations were already leading the way to combat implicit bias, now, all of California’s corporate boards will better reflect the diversity of our state. This is a win-win as ethnically diverse boards have shown to outperform those that lack diversity.”
By the end of 2021, the more than 660 public corporations with California headquarters must have at least one board director from an “underrepresented community,” according to the measure.
Those who qualify would self-identify as black, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian or Alaska Native, or as gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender.
The measure requires at least two such directors by the end of 2022 on boards with four to nine directors. Three directors are required for boards with nine or more directors.
Firms that don’t comply would face fines of $100,00 for first violations and $300,000 for repeated violations.
“When we talk about racial justice, we talk about empowerment, we talk about power, and we need to talk about seats at the table,” Newsom said at an online signing ceremony.
The legislation was part of a package of measures signed by Newsom before a midnight deadline.
Others bar the use of peremptory challenges to remove potential jurors based on race, religion or gender; allow judges to alter sentences that are believed to involve racial or ethnic discrimination; and set up a state task force to study the idea of reparations to African-Americans for slavery.
The only official opponent in a legislative analysis was former California commissioner of corporations Keith Bishop.
He argued that that bill, coupled with the existing diversity law, would make it more desirable for corporations to pick women who also are members of underrepresented communities to simultaneously meet both sets of quotas, to the detriment of men or women who do not meet the qualifications in the new bill.
The Western Journal has reviewed this Associated Press story and may have altered it prior to publication to ensure that it meets our editorial standards.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.