The Chicago White Sox plan to extend the protective netting to the foul poles at Guaranteed Rate Field, becoming the first major league team to take that step since a couple of high-profile injuries this spring increased the focus on fan safety at ballparks.
The White Sox and Illinois Sports Facilities Authority, which owns the ballpark, are hoping to complete the project this season. They said they will announce more details at a later date.
“Obviously that’s a positive step in this sport,” Chicago Cubs outfielder Albert Almora Jr. said before Tuesday night’s 3-1 loss to the White Sox. “I don’t think anybody should go home with bumps or bruises or even worse. So whatever they got to do to take care of that, I’m glad they’re taking procedures.”
The Chicago Sun-Times was the first to report on the plans for Guaranteed Rate Field.
Following recommendations from Major League Baseball, by the start of the 2018 season, all 30 teams had expanded their protective netting to at least the far ends of the dugouts after several fans were injured by foul balls in 2017.
But a liner by Almora struck a young girl in Houston in May, and a woman was hit by a foul ball off the bat of White Sox slugger Eloy Jiménez in Chicago on June 10.
Each of the incidents occurred in the stands beyond the dugout on the third base side, sparking several players to call for expanded netting.
Almora was visibly shaken after the liner against the Astros.
“I am a father and I am a fan of this game,” he said. “I just don’t want to see things like that ever happen again.”
Cubs ace Jon Lester applauded the plan to extend the netting, saying, “It’s a positive. Obviously when one team does it, then you get kind of the herding effect and the rest of the people usually follow.”
Fans’ opinions about the move were mixed, however.
What a way to ruin the feel of a baseball game.
— Michael (@Mengle76) June 18, 2019
I’m all for #MLB teams extending netting down the lines, but I do question how it’s any different than seats beyond the outfield fence. What makes a seat 1 foot to the right of the foul pole any less dangerous?
— Nathan Joyce (@nd_joyce) June 19, 2019
How about the fans make some adjustments instead of the game for a change. Pay attention, put a helmet on the kids, ait in the upper deck or just stay your ass at home where danger doesnt exsist. Ffs
— Mondo (@Black_Bavarian) June 18, 2019
I’m a little embarrassed to admit this but it did take me a while with some serious convincing to get me to buy into the extended netting at MLB games. But I’m all on board for that now. Some of the thrills of getting a ball from a game will be lost, but it shouldn’t cost a life.
— DH (@HalloweenHalpin) June 19, 2019
MLB Rob Manfred said June 4 he doesn’t expect teams to make changes to the protective netting during the season, but he thought conversations would continue about whether netting should be extended.
The netting was expanded before the 2018 season because of a couple of scary plays two years ago.
At Yankee Stadium in May 2017, a boy was struck on the head by a portion of Chris Carter’s broken bat. A fan sitting beyond the first base dugout was hit by a 105-mph foul ball off the bat of Aaron Judge in July of that year. And in September, a young girl was injured by another 105-mph foul ball off the bat of Todd Frazier and was hospitalized.
White Sox ace Lucas Giolito praised his team’s decision to take the next step at its ballpark.
“For me, I think that in today’s day and age you have a lot of young fans and guys are hitting the ball harder,” he said. “I see the counterarguments, like, ‘Well, don’t sit there or just pay attention to the game.’ Dude, like no matter how much you’re paying attention to the game, if that thing is coming in 115 mph with tail, no matter if you have a glove this big, it could hit you right in the forehead.
“So for me being around baseball for so long, I think it’s a smart move because it just keeps people safe. I hate seeing young kids get hit and having to go to the hospital. It just leaves a sick feeling in all our stomachs.”
The Western Journal has reviewed this Associated Press story and may have altered it prior to publication to ensure that it meets our editorial standards.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.