Share
News

Before Bernie's Win, Nevada Caucuses' Rocky Start Had Democrats Telling Volunteers Not To Talk to Media

Share

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders’ margin of victory in the Nevada caucuses on Saturday not only answered questions about whether the Democratic Party is really ready to choose an aging socialist to be its standard-bearer in November, it also laid to rest questions that were being raised about the party’s ability to handle the crowded 2020 field of primary contenders.

But in the run-up to the actual event, Politico reported on Saturday, party insiders were so afraid of a repeat of the Democratic debacle in the Feb. 3 Iowa caucuses that party officials were explicitly telling volunteers not to speak to the media — and apparently offering money to make sure of the silence.

According to the outlet, numerous volunteers in the state’s more rural precincts received official communications Thursday from the Nevada Democratic Party requiring that nondisclosure agreements be signed prior to caucus day, ensuring no-one might “speak to the press unless given permission by the Executive Director or Communications Director” on site.

Trending:
'Holiday Nightmare Comes True' When Man Makes Strange Discovery in a Ravine on His Property

Raising eyebrows, however, was the fact that those communications also promised a one-time payment of $50 to all precinct chairs and $90 to all site leads — which led at least one unnamed individual to tell Politico it seemed as though the party was attempting to pay for volunteer silence.

Nevada Democratic Party spokesman Molly Forgey later denied any relation between the NDA requests and available stipends.

“It is standard for the party to request staff and volunteers who have access to sensitive information to sign [an NDA],” Forgey said.

Yet, volunteers and staff working closer to the Las Vegas area apparently did not receive the same communications, Politico reported.

The national and state party had plenty at stake in ensuring Saturday’s caucus went off without a hitch and as many hiccups as possible were kept under wraps, particularly in light of Iowa caucus meltdown just three weeks ago.

Do you think Bernie Sanders can beat President Donald Trump?

The first contest of the 2020 primary cycle, Iowa’s caucus seemed doomed from the get-go, with precincts across the state reporting substantial difficulties in submitting their results to the Democratic National Committee — a widespread issue that was later chalked up to technical difficulties.

A software error within the Democratic Party’s newly unveiled vote-recording application was later revealed to have been preventing all recorded results from being tabulated, forcing affected precincts to deliver their paper records to the party instead.

The virtual results were later counted as well and the problematic code within the app was eventually fixed, but initial results were retracted on caucus day by numerous mainstream news media outlets such as The Associated Press and The New York Times to prevent confusion.

Final results from the contest were not finished until days later, with former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg besting Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders by a less than one percent margin.

Related:
Report: South African Doctor Who First Noticed Omicron Variant Reels in Doomsayers, Reveals Symptoms Are 'Unusual but Mild'

The fallout was disastrous and, according to DNC Chair Tom Perez, prompted quite a bit of introspection and re-evaluation.

“We have gone to school on the lessons of Iowa,” Perez told CNN on Wednesday. “We are as low-tech as humanly possible while still preserving efficiency.”

“We have held over 1,000 trainings for over 3,000 volunteers. We continue to train them, going to school on Iowa, making sure that the story Saturday night is the candidates,” Perez added. “Not the process.”

Forgey, for her part, was not so uncertain, guaranteeing, “We plan to have results out on caucus day.”

The results were clear by early evening eastern time, with Sanders posting such a dominant performance that Fox News called the Nevada results by about 5:30 p.m.

As of Sunday, Sanders had 46 percent of the vote in a five-candidate field, according to HuffPost, with former Vice President Joe Biden coming in second with about 19 percent of the voter, Buttigieg third with about 15, and Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar in the rear at 10.1 and 4.8 percent respectively.

Now, Democrats have to face the bigger question of whether a nominee like Sanders — an elderly, well left-of-the-mainstream politician who’s more “independent” and “democratic socialist” than actual Democrat — is really the man their party is choosing to take on an incumbent president presiding over a country in the middle of an economic boom.

That is much bigger question than the process in Nevada — and not one the party will be able to keep anyone from talking to the media about.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , , , , ,
Share
Andrew J. Sciascia was the supervising editor of features at The Western Journal. Having joined up as a regular contributor of opinion in 2018, he went on to cover the Barrett confirmation and 2020 presidential election for the outlet, regularly co-hosting its video podcast, "WJ Live," as well.
Andrew J. Sciascia was the supervising editor of features at The Western Journal and regularly co-hosted the outlet's video podcast, "WJ Live."

Sciascia first joined up with The Western Journal as a regular contributor of opinion in 2018, before graduating with a degree in criminal justice and political science from the University of Massachusetts Lowell, where he served as editor-in-chief of the student newspaper and worked briefly as a political operative with the Massachusetts Republican Party.

He covered the Barrett confirmation and 2020 presidential election for The Western Journal. His work has also appeared in The Daily Caller.




Conversation

Notice: Due to threatened de-monetization, we have temporarily removed commenting while we build a long-term commenting solution that allows you to voice your opinion freely and allows us to continue to publish the news fearlessly and cover topics that you care about. If you would like to personally partner with The Western Journal to help us continue publishing while under relentless assault by Big Tech, please visit our subscription page here. We encourage you to share this article and discuss with your friends.