Share
News

CDC Draws Heat for Erasing Women with 'Pregnant People' in Adopting Gender-Neutral Terms for Health Guidance

Share

Editor’s Note: Our readers responded strongly to this story when it originally ran; we’re reposting it here in case you missed it.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has become the latest organization pushing the woke agenda over real science.

The U.K. Daily Mail reported Dec. 3 that the CDC was under fire from critics for replacing the word “woman” with “pregnant people” as part of its recommendations promoting COVID-19 and flu vaccines.

In fact, the CDC had removed all gender-specific terms entirely, including “she,” “her,” “women” and “mother” when referring to a pregnant woman.

Trending:
DOJ Refuses to Comply with Congressional Subpoena and Hand Over Biden Audio, Despite Threat of Contempt

The use of such language was slammed by the likes of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons and Roger Severino, the former head of the Office for Civil Rights within Health and Human Services in the Trump administration.

‘The CDC is supposed to be an apolitical bastion of science, but here they are cowering to political forces, a small minority but highly influential entities, who are trying to change language, Orwellian style, to force acceptance of an absurdity,” Dr. Jane Orient, executive director of APPS, told the Daily Mail.

“All pregnant persons are women,” she continued. “A trans man is a woman who is trying to alter her body to resemble a man’s. She is endangering her baby’s health if she is taking testosterone. The CDC ought to be warning about that.”

Do you support the CDC adopting gender-neutral language?

Severino told the Daily Mail that there is “no medical reason to start changing basic scientific terminology.”

“It’s anti-science in the extreme because where the biological reality of male and female matters most is in the health sciences and in medicine, and to politicize it… offends science and common sense,” he explained.

Stella O’Malley, a psychotherapist and director of the group Genspect, which opposes many aspects of the transgender agenda, called the CDC’s tactics “dangerous,” according to the Daily Mail.

Some groups, such as those who speak English as a second language, might find the nomenclature confusing, she said.

“There was no need to replace the word ‘woman’ with the words ‘pregnant person.’ In medical matters, clarity and simplicity should be prioritized so that everyone can understand what is involved,” O’Malley told the Daily Mail.

Related:
State Wildlife Office Issues Dire Warning After Nine Dead Beavers Found Across Multiple Counties - Don't Approach the Carcasses

‘Some people, especially those for whom English is not a first language, will not understand what is meant by “pregnant people” yet they would readily understand ‘mothers.

“It’s an appalling example of how politics is increasingly interfering with medicine.”

It is not the first time that the CDC has omitted “women” and referenced “pregnant people” instead.

In 2021, then-CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky was met with harsh criticism after she warned how “pregnant people” should get the COVID-19 vaccine.

In the X social media account “@CDCDirector,” Walensky wrote:

“The rise in cases, vaccine hesitancy, and the increased risk of severe illness for pregnant people make vaccination against #COVID19 more urgent than ever,” she wrote at the time. “Read why @CDCgov recommends that pregnant people should be vaccinated against COVID-19.”

The @CDCDirector account now bears the name of current CDC Director, Dr. Mandy K. Cohen.


A Note from Our Staff:

Did you know that 90 percent of advertisers will have nothing to do with The Western Journal? The liberal elites have put us on one of their financial kill lists.

They did it because we’ve told the truth and spoken out against them for over a decade. And since they couldn’t shut us up, now, they’re trying to starve us out.

We’re turning to you because, frankly, we have to have your help. It might not sound like much, but just one membership to The Western Journal can make a real difference.

We don’t have a huge staff, big salaries, or deep donor pockets. We’re family-owned and independent. But because we're independent from the elites, we have to rely on readers like you.

Can we count on you for just a single membership? The cost of a month-long membership is less than a single cup of Starbucks coffee. And, unlike with Starbucks, you can be 100 percent certain that every penny we spend goes toward fighting for traditional American values and against liberal elites.

Please help us continue exposing the truth. Please join today.

Thank you for reading The Western Journal!

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , ,
Share

Conversation