Drudge Report Walloped as Anti-Trump Hatred Takes Devastating Toll
The Drudge Report, once a destination for those seeking a daily dose of factual news, truth and conservative commentary, has reportedly seen its web traffic decline at an alarming rate over the last year, as its founder’s hate for President Donald Trump now leads the coverage.
Matt Drudge, who launched what would become one of the internet’s largest sources for news, started with a simple email newsletter, and broke major stories relating to the Monica Lewisnky scandal in the late 1990s.
Drudge quickly was noted for having a knack for story aggregation and for his understanding of the media landscape.
He’d link reporting on his website in a manner which made it rather convenient to sort out the daily media narratives in just a few minutes.
He was a transformative figure in media, and a trailblazer for conservatives seeking to expand their reach.
His website used to brag over a billion page views monthly, and that wasn’t all that long ago.
Multiple times from 2014 to 2016, when I was writing for another news agency, I’d find a story I’d written was on the top of the Drudge Report, and the traffic generated from that spoke volumes about the influence of the aggregator.
Much of Drudge’s more recent success could be attributed to his early embrace of then-candidate Donald Trump in 2015, and of course of Trump’s economic populism and America First policies.
Trump went on to become the GOP nominee, arguably with help from Drudge, and eventually was elected president.
But Drudge apparently had a change of heart with regard to how he viewed Trump and Trump’s supporters, and it began not long after the president’s 2017 inauguration.
Drudge slowly went negative, and was eventually pushing the left’s wild conspiracy theories about Trump and Russia.
The shift was subtle at first, but it soon became apparent that the former number one destination for fair coverage had devolved into yet another spot for the anti-GOP pile-on.
I removed the site from my browser favorites in 2018, and quit looking at Drudge altogether in 2019 — as did many other once-loyal site visitors.
Who wants their Trump hate aggregated when they can just turn on CNN?
Drudge rarely speaks publicly, and he quickly deletes every tweet he posts online. He also hasn’t divulged publicly why he or the site shifted its tone.
Nonetheless, his namesake website has apparently paid for its leftward lurch with a major plunge in web traffic.
The New York Post, which cited information from the media analytics company Comscore that was obtained by a leftist conservative news watchdog called TheRighting, noted a number of more conservative alternate sources to establishment media outlets saw massive increases in web traffic leading up to the election.
The Drudge Report was reportedly not among them.
“But the pioneering site founded by Matt Drudge in the mid-1990s continues its yearlong decline, plunging another 37 percent to 1,474,000 unique visitors compared to a year ago October when it was still drawing 2,331,000 unique visitors. ,” the Post reported Thursday.
“Drudge himself claims his audience is far larger, with upwards of 25 million visitors a day. But sources say his own numbers skew higher because if someone checks the site multiple times a day, that person is counted each time, whereas Comscore would count that only as one visitor per month.”
If readers are counted as unique visitors for every time they view the site, then Drudge’s numbers are way off.
Some of us used to refresh the page countless times daily.
Now, the site is a feed pushing sensationalist COVID fear and anti-Trump coverage. Plus, Drudge treats every word from Dr. Anthony Fauci as if it’s the gospel. (That’s not even taking into account Drudge’s propensity to pushing weird stores about sex robots.)
But where Drudge, now a purveyor of leftist media narratives and LGBT stories, lost ground year over year, other mostly conservative or faith-friendly outlets, such as The Western Journal, saw big gains in readership this past October compared to October 2019.
“The Blaze was up 48 percent with 11.6 million visitors; The Washington Times up 48 percent with 9 million; Breitbart up 59 percent with 8.3 million; National Review up 24 percent with 7.9 million; and The Western Journal up 68 percent with 7.5 million,” the Post reported.
The Gateway Pundit, PJ Media and The Federalist each saw 200 percent increases in traffic from October 2019 to October 2020.
The Post spoke to Adam Schiffer, the author of “Evaluating Media Bias,” who attempted to demean readers who visit sites such as The Western Journal, Breitbart News, TheBlaze and the others.
“For most of the sites, [the interest] centers around Donald Trump,” Schiffer said.
“[T]he point of consuming for many is not to be informed, it is to be affirmed.”
In other words, Schiffer is saying we’re all in an echo chamber seeking confirmation bias and non-stop Trump loving.
Schiffer, and others like him, have a fundamental misunderstanding of conservatives or anyone with a valid distrust of traditional media outlets.
New media sites, such as this one, only exist because the establishment media quit reporting the whole story a long time ago.
Millions of people are seeking platforms which cut through the misinformation and report each day’s events fairly for people who aren’t being served by the leftist establishment media.
Throughout the last few decades, the far-left bias has only gotten worse as the legacy media has grown more derelict in its duty to report the truth.
Matt Drudge, at one point, understood that.
But for reasons known to him, and not us, he abandoned those who could visit his site daily for a quick read on the pulse of the world.
Drudge is now just another sad purveyor of fake news.
Fortunately, not many people are visiting the site to be misled, if the Post’s reporting is accurate.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
