Parler Share

Elder: Even a First-Year Law Student Can See What's Happening with 'Indictment' of Trump

Parler Share

OK, so indict him already.

On the Senate floor on the first day of the televised Jan. 6 select committee hearings, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said, “[Former President] Donald Trump was at the heart of a coordinated effort to overturn the 2020 elections, to overturn our constitutional order, and inflict permanent damage upon our democracy.”

But Democratic committee member Rep. Jamie Raskin, when asked about possible Justice Department charges against Trump, said, “Attorney General [Merrick] Garland is my constituent, and I don’t browbeat my constituents. I think that he knows, his staff knows, the U.S. attorneys know what’s at stake here. They know the importance of it. But I think they’re rightfully paying close attention to precedent and history, as well as the facts of this case.”

Not exactly full speed ahead.

The day after the first hearing, committee chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson said, “[Criminal referrals to the DOJ are] not our job. Our job is to look at Jan. 6. What caused it and make recommendations after that. … We don’t have the authority.”

After Trump Arrest Story Hits, McCarthy Issues Immediate Orders to Help Ex-POTUS

Committee member Rep. Liz Cheney disagreed, tweeting, “The Committee has not issued a conclusion regarding potential criminal referrals. We will announce a decision on that at an appropriate time.”

Trump, in his speech before the Jan. 6 riots, said, “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

According to The National Desk, “a Capitol Police timeline of the days and weeks surrounding Jan. 6 shows former President Donald Trump’s Department of Defense (DOD) offered the National Guard’s assistance in the days leading up to the violent attack on the U.S. Capitol, validating claims from Trump administration officials that were said to be false by liberal fact-checkers.”

A first-year law student knows the DOJ has no hope of getting a conviction, even with a partisan Washington, D.C., jury, one of which cut loose Michael Sussmann, a Hillary Clinton lawyer who escaped conviction even though he clearly lied to the FBI. He falsely told the FBI he was acting as a private citizen when he delivered thumb drives with false claims of Trump-Russia collusion. Yet he billed Clinton for “work and communications regarding confidential project” on the day of the FBI meeting and for the thumb drives he purchased six days earlier. The jury let him walk.

Do you think Trump will be indicted?

By the way, where were these nouveau proponents of law and order during the bloody and violent summer of 2020?

In June 2020, Patrisse Cullors, co-founder of Black Lives Matter, said, “People are at their wits’ end with the lack of accountability and the ability for police to continue to kill, abuse, maim and torture black people. And so George Floyd’s murder is just the tipping point.” She added, “I think people are upset. They’re angry. They have been for a long time. I think these protests will last for a long time.”

They did.

The violent “insurrections” that summer resulted in the death of at least 25, thousands of arrests, 2,000 cops injured and, according to Axios, “at least $1 billion to $2 billion of paid insurance claims.” Real Clear Investigations concluded the riots resulted in “15 times more injured police officers, 23 times as many arrests, and estimated damages in dollar terms up to 1,300 times more costly than those of the Capitol riot.”

All of this, of course, will be dismissed by many as “whataboutism” — a term, tactic and rhetorical device often resorted to by intellectually dishonest leftists when they’re called out on their hypocrisy, double standards and selective outrage.

Mike Huckabee: Tucker Carlson Continues to Press on J6 Security Video


The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

, ,
Parler Share