Fox Sports Host Obliterates LeBron James Over Cop-Threatening Tweet


LeBron James’ infamous tweet in the wake of the Ma’Khia Bryant shooting didn’t go over well with Fox Sports’ Marcellus Wiley.

Wiley, a former NFL player, was reacting to the NBA legend’s post, which included a picture of the officer who fatally shot 16-year-old Bryant in Columbus, Ohio, on Tuesday, along with the text “YOU’RE NEXT #ACCOUNTABILITY.”

James, not really a fan of accountability himself, didn’t apologize for the tweet after he deleted it. In a self-contradictory statement, he said anger doesn’t do “any of us any good,” but that his “anger still is here for what happened that lil girl.”

Hydrothermal Explosion at Yellowstone Sends Park Visitors Running for Their Lives, Area Now Closed

Bryant, who allegedly was aiming to stab a female pinned against a car when she was shot, became an instant cause célèbre among a certain subset of the left which believes any shooting by a police officer is prima facie unjustified until proved otherwise.

Even by the low standards of this cohort, James’ take still stood out for its awfulness, given the rapidity with which he backpedaled after the tweet was deleted.

Wiley’s take on James’ Ma’Khia Bryant tweet and subsequent response: “Dog, you can’t do this.”

During the segment on “Speak for Yourself,” Wiley said he hoped  LeBron’s “profoundness will one day match the power of his platform.”

Should LeBron James apologize for this tweet?

“You can’t be that irresponsible if you’re LeBron James because you have that much power, and we all know when you get that type of power that responsibility comes with it,” Wiley said, noting James wanted “to be first — not right.”

Watch: Bronny James Under Fire for Saying He 'Never Thought' of Playing with LeBron After Being Drafted by Lakers

Wiley also said he found James’ hashtag to be ironic, given that the situation called for “accountability, not just rooting interest.”

James, he said, should have “passed in this moment.”

“He has that platform, he has that power, he has those followers. And he knows that those people are listening for every single word he’s going to profess,” Wiley said of James, a four-time NBA Most Valuable Player who plays for the Los Angeles Lakers.

“Emotions can’t trump logic, and that’s what’s happening,” Wiley continued. “Your agenda can’t go before your acumen. You can’t pander before your principles.”

Yes, Wiley said, James meant well, but his thought was misplaced.

“LeBron James, he failed in that moment. I don’t care how smart you are if you don’t stop and think,” Wiley said.

There also was, to Wiley, the issue of what James focused on as opposed to what James could be focusing on. The issue of police violence against black people — one that inspires many of James’ tweets — might get the likes and the followers, but to Wiley, that wasn’t really the problem.

“LeBron James says, ‘I’m so damn tired of seeing black people killed by police.’ With that platform,” Wiley said.

“How about this sentence instead of that: ‘I’m so damn tired of seeing black people killed?’ A little difference. How about this sentence, even more idealistic: ‘I’m so damn tired of just seeing people killed?'”

And then there was James’ overheated rhetoric about how serious the threat from police violence actually was.

“LeBron says he’s scared to leave his house,” Wiley said. “Why? What? I’m not scared to leave my house, and I’m not LeBron James.”

Wiley also noted that James talked about a “broken system,” but that “the same system that is so broken, it allows you to become a billionaire and never get arrested in it — but the system is broken?”

“The irresponsibility that shows in the micro makes me say be responsible about the macro,” Wiley continued. “Like, dog, 250 black people [are] killed by police every year, that’s 250 too many people. But in the macro sense, there are 7,500 homicides to black people every single year as well. I’m not saying LeBron you got that put the focus on that, fully, but let’s be responsible,” Wiley said. … “There’s 7,500 in totality that never get the discussion because the people with the platform are not highlighting that.”

Wiley and I have different estimations about how well-meaning James is, with this writer believing this is more about branding than it is about a sincere, heartfelt desire to address political concerns. We’d agree, however, that while this is coming from someone who may or may not be smart, it’s someone who isn’t thinking — and it’s someone with a history of this behavior.

LeBron James isn’t afraid to leave his house. He’s not speaking from a place where he’s realistically looking at the threat posed by police violence. Positioning, as opposed to efficacy, is what James’ social media presence is about.

Unfortunately, positioning only works if you look before you leap. There was no looking involved here — just leaping.

James didn’t know the facts. He threatened a cop and ignored the black victims of crime, including the one whose life may have been saved by the officer James was condemning.

He needs to be accountable and apologize, but don’t expect that level of profoundness to ever match the power of his platform.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

, , , , , ,
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014. Aside from politics, he enjoys spending time with his wife, literature (especially British comic novels and modern Japanese lit), indie rock, coffee, Formula One and football (of both American and world varieties).
Morristown, New Jersey
Catholic University of America
Languages Spoken
English, Spanish
Topics of Expertise
American Politics, World Politics, Culture