San Francisco has spent millions of dollars housing the homeless before spending more to evict them, according to recent documents obtained by the San Francisco Chronicle.
Since 2019, the city has spent over $160 million every fiscal year on “permanent supportive housing” — i.e. single-room-occupancy hotels across the city — as part of Mayor London Breed’s response to the city’s homelessness crisis, according to the documents obtained by the Chronicle.
Breed’s administration has also evicted more than 400 tenants from these SROs for violations of conditions of stay, making up a quarter of all evictions in the city despite housing only 1.3 percent of all tenants.
Reasons for eviction ranged from breaking the policy on guests to verbal abuse and violence against SRO workers and other tenants, with instances including assaults with deadly weapons, destruction of rooms and even arson.
Tenants may only be evicted after a judicial process, the entire cost of which is funded by taxpayers, with the homeless receiving public defenders.
City officials interviewed by the Chronicle estimated that the cost of litigation can range up to $25,000 per tenant.
In response to these costs, according to the Chronicle, Breed’s administration further appropriated $62.4 million to clear the backlog of eviction caseloads in San Francisco and hire more workers to manage evictees — as well as increase their salaries.
The mounting costs to taxpayers of Breed’s housing initiatives and removal of evictees, who often return to city streets, come as San Francisco experiences an unprecedented homelessness crisis.
More than 7,700 people in the city are homeless; nearly 3,300 live in SROs operated by non-profits and the city, according to city statistics. The effects of homelessness on citizens are profound — assault, smash-and-grab thefts, harassment, public defecation and vandalism by the homeless occur regularly.
Open-air drug use is seen by residents as the cause of the problem. “We are experiencing a heavy meth and fentanyl problem and the lifestyle that goes with it,” small-business owner Kathy Amendola told ABC News.
People say lack of housing forces local residents into the streets, but James says he came from Texas to San Francisco for the drugs, the non-enforcement of anti-camping laws, and the $820/month in welfare & food stamps. James says he sold fentanyl, 2 weeks ago, to a 15-year-old. pic.twitter.com/5qMr6tmlWs
— Michael Shellenberger (@ShellenbergerMD) February 9, 2022
Homelessness is but one chronic problem that the Breed administration is currently facing, according to the Chronicle.
Currently, San Francisco’s housing costs are among the highest in the nation, with median monthly rent exceeding $3,500 for a one-bedroom apartment.
Meanwhile, truancy and absence rates in the city’s public schools have reached historic levels, with 28.4 percent of students being chronically absent over the 2021-22 academic year, The Daily Caller reported.
Voters have responded to these problems with “recall initiatives” designed to allow citizens to remove elected officials from office under California law, thereby replacingcity leaders mid-term. In 2022 alone, San Francisco voters ousted District Attorney Chesa Boudin, who adopted lenient measures against criminal defendants, as well as three members of the seven-member Unified School District Board.
No significant recall petitions have been filed against Breed, however, who has taken a tough-on-crime approach to violence by the homeless and, in December, declared a state of emergency in response.
Neither Breed’s office nor the San Francisco Housing Authority have responded to requests for comment from the Daily Caller News Foundation.
Content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of the DCNF’s original content, please contact email@example.com.
A version of this article appeared on the Daily Caller News Foundation website.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.