NFL Network Horribly Botches Attempt To Break Antonio Brown Trade News

At one point late on Thursday night, Antonio Brown was the No. 1 trending topic on Twitter.

It wasn’t because of a crazy social media video, or new facial hair, or a teammate who was thrown under the bus. The wide receiver was trending because it was reported that the Pittsburgh Steelers had traded him to the Buffalo Bills.

It wasn’t just “Steve from Buffalo” or a random blog that reported the news — it was top insider Ian Rapoport of the league-owned NFL Network.

“The #Steelers are closing in on a deal to send star WR Antonio Brown to the Buffalo #Bills,” he tweeted. “There it is.”

Sources: The #Steelers are closing in on a deal to send star WR Antonio Brown to the Buffalo #Bills. There it is.

— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) March 8, 2019

Rapoport followed that tweet with another that said, “Buffalo is on its way to getting AB,” and NFL.com published an article saying Pittsburgh was closing in on a deal with Buffalo for Brown.

But things started to unravel when the NFL’s Instagram account created a “Breaking News” post on Brown going to Buffalo.

The person who would know more about the trade than anyone else — Brown himself — commented on the post with “Fake News.”

Antonio Brown comments on the NFL’s Instagram post. Fake news? Not fake news? 🤷🏻‍♀️ pic.twitter.com/nprqr9ul8V

— Heather Prusak (@haprusak) March 8, 2019

Fast forward to Friday morning and the Bills released a statement confirming that they had inquired about Brown three days earlier but had decided a deal “didn’t make sense.”

A statement from GM Brandon Beane. pic.twitter.com/GK8wMqFTCA

— Buffalo Bills (@buffalobills) March 8, 2019

Rapoport tweeted that the Bills and Steelers “neared a trade” Thursday night but the receiver “would not commit to showing up in Buffalo.”

From @gmfb: The #Bills neared a trade last night for WR Antonio Brown, who would not commit to showing up in Buffalo. The organization did speak with agent Drew Rosenhaus. This morning, Buffalo says they are out, amid uncertainty. Steelers are square one again. pic.twitter.com/d4suLfaVWP

— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) March 8, 2019

“We went from last night to being close on trade compensation to a deal being nearly there, just wanted to clear that final huddle,” Rapoport said. “And then based on what the Bills heard late last night and again early this morning, they decided that it did not make sense for them to trade for Antonio Brown and they are moving on.”

Do you think Antonio Brown would have been a good fit in Buffalo?

Rapoport said the uncertainty of Brown showing up “wasn’t worth the drama” for the Bills to go through with the deal.

However, at roughly the same time all of this was playing out via the NFL Network, ESPN’s Adam Schefter called a Brown trade to the Bills “unlikely.”

Schefter also said one of his sources told him that Brown to the Bills was an “old story” that was settled the day before.

Another source on a potential Antonio Brown-to-Buffalo trade said it will not happen. “I don’t think the Bills trade was ever close to happening,” said one source involved in those talks. Steelers snd Bills briefly talked but “this is an old story. It was dead on Wednesday.”

— Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) March 8, 2019

So we are back to where we were over 48 hours ago and Antonio Brown is still a Steeler.

He still wants to be moved and still wants a new contract, but neither of those seems likely to happen before the start of free agent negotiation Monday.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.