Share
Commentary

Did You See What the People Online Did When Sen. Warren Attacked the 'Redskins' Owner?

Share

In a Sunday article arguing that Sen. Elizabeth Warren was “nerding out” to try and differentiate herself from an already-crowded 2020 Democratic field, The New York Times’ Astead W. Herndon said that the senator’s “passion for policy minutiae has become her way of standing out in an increasingly crowded Democratic field.”

And no issue has come to represent that better than what the Massachusetts senator has become fond of referring to as an “ultra-millionaire tax.”

Put simply, it’s an annual 2 percent tax on households with accumulated wealth of $50 million and 3 percent on households worth more than $1 billion. It’s not just conservatives that think that’s a bad idea; no less than the editorial board of The Washington Post noted that it was possibly an unconstitutional expansion of the federal government’s taxation powers and “would create a huge incentive for tax avoidance among a segment of society well able to afford accountants and lawyers,” among other problems.

(It’s worth noting that the typically liberal WaPo happens to be owned by the Amazon mega-billionaire Jeff Bezos, but that’s probably just a coincidence.)

So, when Warren’s “passion for policy minutiae” didn’t end with a policy that paid enough attention to the minutiae, how could she differentiate herself?

Trending:
You Have to Be Kidding Me: Biden Admin Comes Up With Meme Even Lamer than Obama's 'Pajama Boy'

Straight-up demagogy, of course. And who better to demagogue than Washington Redskins owner Daniel Snyder?

Because clearly Sen. Warren doesn’t have any history with, say, Native American associations or anything. Nothing to that effect. This could only end well.

Snyder, you may have heard, just bought himself a $100 million yacht. It also has an Imax theater, something that The Washington Post couldn’t help putting in its headline. (The editorial board may have reservations about the “ultra-millionaire tax,” but it’s still the WaPo.) Warren retweeted it as a justification for her proposed tax.

“This billionaire NFL owner just paid $100M for a ‘superyacht’ with its own iMax theater,” she wrote in a Saturday tweet. “I’m pretty sure he can pay my new #UltraMillionaireTax to help the millions of yacht-less Americans struggling with student loan debt.”

It didn’t take long for a lot of blue-checkmark Twitterdom to respond to the policy implications.

Related:
Report: Democrats Are Considering the 'Nuclear Option' for Kamala Harris

But then, of course, there were those who pointed out the real mistake here: who Warren had gone after and her utter lack of self-awareness in the matter.

Some without checkmarks pointed out equally salient points: Namely, student loan debt and other financial problems could be solved if two of the fields Warren has been in, government and academia, were more responsible with money.

Well, they certainly have points. However, the primary thing about this is the optics of it.

Far from “nerding out,” this is a blatant appeal to emotion: “Rich person has yacht. You have student loan debt. Rich person with yacht will pay for student loan debt if you elect me.”

Do you think Elizabeth Warren will be the 2020 Democrat nominee?

But yet again, there’s the same pratfall. There are no shortage of articles from The Washington Post, New York Times, The New Yorker, Vox and any number of sundry liberal publications that take rich folks to task over their purported excesses.

Sen. Warren has to choose one about the owner of the Washington Redskins? Was there no one around who could have vetted this tweet? Has she not learned from experience? Was there no “teachable moment” in that whole DNA debacle?

If Sen. Warren cannot help but to bring voters back to what’s unquestionably her worst moment — and a moment which has been dragged out unnecessarily over more than half a decade at this point, it must be noted — how does she have a realistic path to 2020?

From experience, I can’t see this not happening with unfortunate frequency. There’s no amount of “nerding out” or “passion for policy minutiae” that’s going to overcome Warren shooting herself in the foot over and over again.

With an arrow, of course.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , ,
Share
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014. Aside from politics, he enjoys spending time with his wife, literature (especially British comic novels and modern Japanese lit), indie rock, coffee, Formula One and football (of both American and world varieties).
Birthplace
Morristown, New Jersey
Education
Catholic University of America
Languages Spoken
English, Spanish
Topics of Expertise
American Politics, World Politics, Culture




Conversation

Notice: Due to threatened de-monetization, we have temporarily removed commenting while we build a long-term commenting solution that allows you to voice your opinion freely and allows us to continue to publish the news fearlessly and cover topics that you care about. If you would like to personally partner with The Western Journal to help us continue publishing while under relentless assault by Big Tech, please visit our subscription page here. We encourage you to share this article and discuss with your friends.