Share
News

Supreme Court Hands Down Big Victory to Trump, Even Joe Biden Agreed

Share

In a case that found the Biden administration supporting a position taken by former President Donald Trump, steel tariffs imposed by Trump will remain in effect.

The court on Monday denied to hear the appeal of USP Holdings after lower courts rejected its claim that the Trump administration acted improperly when it enacted the tariffs.

President Joe Biden has left the tariffs largely as Trump imposed it and supported the tariffs in the court case against USP Holdings and other companies that said they import steel and were damaged by the tariffs, according to the Epoch Times.

Trending:
Investigators Find Cause of Fatal Roller Coaster Derailment: 'We Will Make Sure Something Like This Will Never Happen Again'

Politico noted that although the tariffs angered allies, American workers were part of the presidential equation in Biden keeping a piece of Trump’s policy intact.

“The Biden administration understands that simply lifting steel tariffs without any solution in place, particularly beyond the dialogue, could well mean layoffs and plant closures in Pennsylvania and in Ohio and other states where obviously the impact would be felt not only economically but politically,” said Scott Paul, president of the Alliance for American Manufacturing.

The tariffs went into effect on March 1, 2018. A 25 percent tariff on imported steel from most countries was imposed, along with a 10 percent tariff on imported aluminum.

“When a country (USA) is losing many billions of dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business with, trade wars are good, and easy to win. Example, when we are down $100 billion with a certain country and they get cute, don’t trade anymore — we win big. It’s easy!” Trump tweeted when the tariff was imposed.

Do you think having a president who is experienced in business is a good thing?

The case largely focused on the administrative machinations of the tariff’s approval.

As noted in their petition to the Supreme Court, USP and the other companies suing tried to claim that former Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross’ report that recommended the tariff was in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, claiming the report was  “arbitrary and capricious.”

The Trade Court rejected that argument in 2021, saying the report was not a final agency action.

Related:
Federal Judge Blocks Biden's Transgender Title IX Changes, Slams Admin for 'Abuse of Power'

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit differed from the trade Court about the report, but still denied that imposing the tariffs violated the Administrative Procedures Act.

USP Holdings then appealed to the Supreme Court, which turned away the appeal without comment.

“The tariffs have had, I would say, very modest impacts on steel-consuming industries and have had the desired results so far for the domestic [steel] industry,” Paul said, according to Politico.

The Supreme Court last year refused to hear a challenge by steel companies to Trump’s 2018 action to double tariffs on steel from Turkey, according to U.S. News & World Report.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , ,
Share
Jack Davis is a freelance writer who joined The Western Journal in July 2015 and chronicled the campaign that saw President Donald Trump elected. Since then, he has written extensively for The Western Journal on the Trump administration as well as foreign policy and military issues.
Jack Davis is a freelance writer who joined The Western Journal in July 2015 and chronicled the campaign that saw President Donald Trump elected. Since then, he has written extensively for The Western Journal on the Trump administration as well as foreign policy and military issues.
Jack can be reached at jackwritings1@gmail.com.
Location
New York City
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Foreign Policy, Military & Defense Issues




Conversation