Share
Commentary

Tragedy: Huge Number of National Guardsmen Get COVID from Biden Inauguration

Share

On the day after Joe Biden’s inauguration, the National Guard announced that the 26,000 troops who were deployed to Washington, D.C., didn’t face any security threats.

“There were no security incidents reported involving the National Guard,” a news release from the National Guard Bureau read.

“Our ability to move 26,000 Soldiers and Airmen to DC from every state and territory in less than two weeks would not have been possible without the support of our governors and their adjutants general,” said Army Gen. Daniel Hokanson, head of the National Guard.

“It speaks volumes about America’s investment in the National Guard; and most importantly, the support our service members get from their family and their employers.”

There may have been no security incidents reported. After all, we moved more National Guardsmen into the 68 square miles of our nation’s capital than troops that we have in the whole of Afghanistan. One would hope that would be the outcome.

Trending:
Hillary Clinton Will Hate What Was Found on the Walls of Jeffrey Epstein's Mansion

However, to say there weren’t any threats at all would be inaccurate, and to say the exercise spoke volumes about our country’s investment in the National Guard may be problematic, at least when you factor in that almost 200 of the men and women who deployed to the District of Columbia have tested positive for COVID-19.

According to a report in Friday’s Wall Street Journal, defense officials say the cramped quarters the troops were housed in may have played a role in transmission.

This comes after pictures and videos which showed Guardsmen forced to rest in an underground parking garage in Washington because they’d gotten kicked out of the Capitol — already not an ideal situation, particularly if you want to stop transmission of COVID-19 — began circulating the day after the inauguration.

Did there need to be 26,000 troops in Washington, D.C., for the inauguration?

Related:
After Trashing Trump for Contesting Election, Biden Tells America November Midterms 'Easily Could Be Illegitimate'

One defense official told The Wall Street Journal that this “raised concerns COVID-19 protocols can’t be maintained,” the newspaper reported.

Well, yes.

Furthermore, the outlet reported that not every Guardsman was tested for COVID-19 before they were deployed to Washington, D.C. While they were screened, unless the test was part of the screening process, it wasn’t necessarily carried out.

Days before the inauguration, The Associated Press reported the FBI was vetting the troops being sent to the inauguration because of fears there might be extremists within the Guard who would carry out the kind of attack the Guard was supposed to prevent. Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said troops in D.C. were also receiving training to identify against threats within the ranks.

The FBI and the military were willing to go through these steps, but the troops being deployed weren’t necessarily tested for COVID-19 first, nor did anyone at the federal level ensure they were at least housed in situations where COVID protocols could be properly followed.

Let that sink in.

Furthermore, 5,000 of these Guardsmen are expected to stay on in the nation’s capital through March. While we’re not necessarily going to see cases like them sleeping in garages ever again, why are we to believe the situation is now under control? This isn’t a stellar track record so far.

Officials may say hindsight is 20/20, but this wasn’t being criticized in hindsight. As an overreaction to the Capitol incursion — an attack at which there was no National Guard presence until it was too late — we stuffed the nation’s capital with troops.

People said this was for optics when it was being done. It turned out to be optics.

And it’s optics that could have ended up with those troops getting infected with COVID-19. They may have faced a threat, but it wasn’t from extremists.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , ,
Share
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014. Aside from politics, he enjoys spending time with his wife, literature (especially British comic novels and modern Japanese lit), indie rock, coffee, Formula One and football (of both American and world varieties).
Birthplace
Morristown, New Jersey
Education
Catholic University of America
Languages Spoken
English, Spanish
Topics of Expertise
American Politics, World Politics, Culture




Conversation

The Western Journal is pleased to bring back comments to our articles! Due to threatened de-monetization by Big Tech, we had temporarily removed comments, but we have now implemented a solution to bring back the conversation that Big Tech doesn't want you to have. If you have any problems using the new commenting platform, please contact customer support at commenting-help@insticator.com. Welcome back!