Unhinged Jim Carrey Releases Sick New Artwork, Gives Kavanaugh a 'New Uniform'
Actor and wannabe political cartoonist Jim Carrey has released another sickening and crudely painted depiction of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh on Twitter.
Carrey’s new painting is an addition to his previous one in which he depicted Kavanaugh committing a sexual assault.
I’m still waiting on a painting of Democrat Rep. Keith Ellison, who is facing domestic abuse accusations.
However, that would go against the left’s agenda, which Carrey seems to unquestioningly follow.
His new painting depicts Kavanaugh with a wide grin wearing a black mask and judicial attire akin to those worn by Supreme Court Justices.
I actually like this painting more than his last one. At least Carrey is now accepting that Kavanaugh will be a Supreme Court Justice.
Of course, the painting would not be complete without the unhinged rant of a washed-up actor to accompany it.
“Colleges care more about donors than the victims of on-campus rape. That’s why women don’t report it and why ENTITLED LITTLE SH- like Injustice Kavanaugh get to party and pillage their way to the Supreme Court.I’d like to suggest a new uniform for the highest court in the land,” the rant read.
https://twitter.com/JimCarrey/status/1044253722833031169
I don’t understand why Carrey is so convinced that there is an epidemic of unreported rapists on college campuses.
In fact, the standard of evidence used by colleges in sexual assault cases has actually been less demanding than the standard of evidence needed for a criminal conviction.
The Obama administration only required students to prove their case with a “preponderance of the evidence” instead of the previous standard of “clear and convincing,” according to The Atlantic.
To simplify it, to have a “preponderance of the evidence” means that your argument, supported by some evidence, is only slightly more convincing than the other party’s argument.
The “preponderance of the evidence” standard doesn’t require you to have a certain amount of evidence and its meaning is “somewhat subjective,” according to Law.com.
Neither of those standards is good enough for a criminal conviction, which requires a standard of evidence “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
However, I am not surprised that Carrey is unconcerned with the details.
At this point, Carrey’s paintings have lost their shock value. I’m actually more concerned about Carrey himself than I am about the paintings. Someone should really check on him.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
